As Elizabeth Holmes takes the stand in the criminal case against her, her testimony faces a challenge: persuading jurors that whatever her missteps, she didn’t intend to defraud.

Over 11 weeks of testimony, prosecutors in the Theranos Inc. founder’s trial presented a narrative of a CEO who repeatedly fabricated the successes of her technology as she built a blood-testing startup that ultimately failed. They now have to hope they convinced jurors her behavior rose to the level of criminal fraud.

This post first appeared on wsj.com

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You May Also Like

Embattled attorney Alex Murdaugh indicted in slayings of wife and son

A grand jury indicted embattled South Carolina attorney Alex Murdaugh on murder…

California man released after 28 years in prison when DNA clears him of rape, robbery case

LOS ANGELES — A man who spent nearly 30 years in prison…

Death row inmate facing execution this week has appeal denied despite new evidence

NASHVILLE, Tenn. — The Tennessee Supreme Court on Monday declined to hear…

Everyone’s a Landlord—Small-Time Investors Snap Up Out-of-State Properties

Jack Cronin found San Francisco-area homes too expensive or too far from…