Her efforts to suppress what she believed was an embarrassing photograph only made matters worse

It has been quite the fortnight for the Streisand effect, the cultural phenomenon of attracting far more attention to a photograph by trying to suppress it than if it had been left to exist without comment. Named after the singer, who sued a photographer for $10m in 2003 for posting pictures of her house online, which few knew was Streisand’s house until she sued him, it has really come into its own in the age of social media, particularly if you are part of one of the most curated, carefully lit families in the celebrity world.

There was a recent precedent for the current drama. On a podcast, former The OC star Rachel Bilson discussed the time she posted a picture to Instagram of her with an old classmate, the actor Rami Malek, during their school days. She admitted that it was “dorky”. He messaged her and unceremoniously asked her to take it down as he is “a private person”; Bilson said that she was “a little bummed at how it was handled”. A picture that might have gone unnoticed has now done the rounds, particularly since Bilson shared the anecdote. Maybe that is a Streisand-by-proxy.

Continue reading…

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You May Also Like

Criminal justice system is ‘on its knees’, says top English lawyer

Criminal Bar Association chair says funding cuts punishing victims more than criminals…

The Guardian view on public sector pay: Labour needs an answer | Editorial

The opposition should be clearer about its own solutions to disputes that…

New York to allow weddings for up to 150 – but no dancing outside your zone

Guests will have to move in socially distanced ‘dance zones’ Attendees must…

Travel industry pays tribute after death of John Hays

Hays started eponymous firm in 1980, and with wife rescued thousands of…