Former reviewer of terror laws says minister’s foreword mischaracterises experts’ conclusions

The former independent reviewer of terrorism legislation has accused the government of mischaracterising the findings of the inquiry it commissioned into judicial review in order to challenge courts holding it to account.

The Faulks review, published on Thursday, was ordered after a pledge in the Conservative election manifesto to end “abuse” of judicial review, widely seen as a response to two Brexit-related government defeats in the supreme court.

Continue reading…

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You May Also Like

Johnson urged to denounce Trump’s unsubstantiated US election fraud claims

UK prime minister stands in contrast to stance from German politicians who…

Cheap flights, Brexit, now Dover chaos – is this the end of the road for continental coach tours?

While many operators still ply the cross-Channel route, some businesses are focusing…

Where have all the carol singers gone? | Letter

Gary Freestone recalls December evenings when carollers would go door to door,…

Richard Williams

will smith apology, what did chris rock say, why did will slap…