Analysis: focus shifts away from cooperation with the EU but fails to balance far east investment and security issues

Prof John Bew, the historian appointed by Boris Johnson to write the foreign and defence security review, has privately insisted the document should not be seen as an apology for Brexit or a turning away from Europe, the charge sometimes levelled by pro-EU critics such as the former national security adviser Lord Ricketts and Sir Simon Fraser, the former foreign office permanent secretary.

It is instead intended as a hard-headed look at the new collective security threats facing Britain, many of which, notably the rise of China, the spread of authoritarianism, the challenge of the climate crisis and the ubiquity of cyberwarfare, the UK would have faced in or out of the European Union.

Continue reading…

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You May Also Like

Russia and the west compete to secure safe passage for Ukraine’s grain

Analysis: both sides agree grain must reach world markets soon but each…

A tale of two cities: Paris proves that you don’t need skyscrapers to thrive | Rowan Moore

A ban on high-rise buildings contrasts with Britain’s ever thrusting capital There’s…

Warnings on air pollution need to be directed towards polluters – study

Focus of information places health responsibility on those who bear consequences of…

Asylum seekers on hunger strike over conditions at Kent barracks site

Home Office urged to shut temporary accommodation after allegations of overcrowding and…