Readers respond to an article by Susan McKay discussing the prospect of a united Ireland and the need for constitutional change

Susan McKay falls into the same trap as others who predict the imminence of a united Ireland (On the far side of borders, a new Ireland is taking shape, 9 October). She fails to address the question of what form reunification would take.

Does she envisage the six counties and their 18 Westminster constituencies simply decanting into the Irish Republic, to be governed directly from Dublin? Or would she favour some kind of federation preserving the Belfast agreement and guaranteeing northern unionists a separate status with a say in their own affairs? These are the key questions that resulted in partition in 1918-20. No referendum could be fought today without answering them.
Alan Boyle
Emeritus professor of international law, University of Edinburgh

Continue reading…

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You May Also Like

And Breathe dominates Black British theatre awards

Yomi Ṣode’s one-hander and Regent’s Park production of Romeo and Juliet win…

Loves cheese, hates her first name: 10 things you may not know about Liz Truss

Foreign secretary – real name Mary Elizabeth Truss – is the current…

Doctors and unions join bereaved families to highlight issues for Covid inquiry

British Medical Association and Trades Unions Congress add to calls for No…

Dominic Raab says he feared Boris Johnson might die from Covid

In Tory conference speech, foreign secretary also addresses Brexit and ‘global Britain’…