Analysis: First minister is seeking supreme court ruling but experts say there is ‘nothing new’ in her request

There have always been three routes to a second referendum on Scottish independence and, despite the buildup and rhetoric around Tuesday’s statement, they remain unchanged – a section 30 order from the UK government; risking a domestic boycott and international opprobrium with a wildcat vote; or putting a referendum bill to the Holyrood parliament and facing down an almost inevitable court challenge.

Nicola Sturgeon told MSPs on Tuesday afternoon that she had written to Boris Johnson again, the latest of repeated requests for a section 30 order under the 1998 Scotland Act that would grant Holyrood the competence to legislate for another referendum. The previous one happened in 2014 and it is a process described as the “gold standard” by the first minister.

Continue reading…

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You May Also Like

U.S. Open men’s final

Alexander Zverev

The rejection of China’s deal shows the Pacific will not be used as a geopolitical pawn | Henry Ivarature

Pacific leaders have sent a strong message that countries who want to…

Avoiding Paris pain would only paper cracks for Jones’s maddening England | Robert Kitson

Eddie Jones’s side can deny France a first grand slam since 2010…

Row over possible River Cam bathing spot frequented by Darwin and Lord Byron

Proponents of ‘bathing waters’ designation say it would force action on sewage…