If we can’t dramatically cut meat consumption then intensive ‘factory farming’ may be comparatively less risky, say authors

The industrial farming of animals such as pigs, poultry and cattle to provide meat for hundreds of millions of people may reduce the risk of pandemics and the emergence of dangerous diseases including Sars, BSE, bird flu and Covid-19 compared with less-intensive farming, a major study by vets and ecologists has found.

Despite reports from the UN and other bodies in the wake of Covid linking the intensive farming of livestock to the spread of zoonotic (animal-borne) diseases, the authors argue that “non-intensive” or “low-yield” farms pose a more serious risk to human health because they require far more land to produce the same amount of food.

Continue reading…

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You May Also Like

COVID-19 Ontario Canada

covid 19 coronavirus

Windrush campaigners alarmed by omissions of No 10 race report

As scandal is mentioned twice in 258 pages, some of those affected…

Condemnation as pro-Palestinian sticker placed over star of David on Amy Winehouse statue

Environment secretary Steve Barclay says incident is ‘deeply concerning’ and reiterates government…

Truss’s testing week ahead: where the PM has to prove herself, day by day

After meeting world leaders and giving a reading at the Queen’s funeral,…