If the people of Amity Island had this, than Jaws may have turned out a lot differently.

Researchers at engineering company Cardno and Bond University have found that a $500 rechargeable device that clips onto surfboards reduces the chances of a shark attack by two-thirds.

The experts tested the device, known as Rpela V2 on great whites at Salisbury Island, Western Australia, long considered a ‘hotspot’ for sharks.

A $500 rechargeable device that clips onto surfboards reduces the chances of a shark attack by two-thirds, according to a new study. It was tested on great whites (pictured)

A $500 rechargeable device that clips onto surfboards reduces the chances of a shark attack by two-thirds, according to a new study. It was tested on great whites (pictured)

A $500 rechargeable device that clips onto surfboards reduces the chances of a shark attack by two-thirds, according to a new study. It was tested on great whites (pictured)

The Rpela V2 clips into the surfboard's bottom deck and uses an electric field to overwhelm the shark's electro-reception organs that they use to navigate

The Rpela V2 clips into the surfboard's bottom deck and uses an electric field to overwhelm the shark's electro-reception organs that they use to navigate

The Rpela V2 clips into the surfboard’s bottom deck and uses an electric field to overwhelm the shark’s electro-reception organs that they use to navigate

The researchers found that the electric pulse did not endanger the sharks

The researchers found that the electric pulse did not endanger the sharks

The researchers found that the electric pulse did not endanger the sharks

The device clips into the surfboard’s bottom deck and uses an electric field to overwhelm the shark’s electro-reception organs that they use to navigate. 

The researchers found that the electric pulse did not endanger the sharks.

‘Such a stimulus does not harm a shark but may encourage a shark to rapidly move away from an area or change its behavior,’ they wrote in the study, likening it to a person who moves away from ‘very loud music that becomes unpleasant.’

The researchers also found that Rpela V2 cut shark interactions (such as a nudge) with surfers by 38 percent, which could give them extra time to get out of the water after they encounter the apex predator. 

‘There are many different individual shark deterrents available but most, including some that are very popular, are not effective or have not been independently tested,’ study co-author and Bond University shark expert Dr Daryl McPhee said in a statement.

‘This means surfers may put themselves at risk thinking they have an additional layer of protection when they do not.’

It was tested on great whites at Salisbury Island, Western Australia, an area considered a 'hotspot' for sharks

It was tested on great whites at Salisbury Island, Western Australia, an area considered a 'hotspot' for sharks

It was tested on great whites at Salisbury Island, Western Australia, an area considered a ‘hotspot’ for sharks

The device clips into the surfboard's bottom deck and uses an electric field to overwhelm the shark's electro-reception organs that they use to navigate

The device clips into the surfboard's bottom deck and uses an electric field to overwhelm the shark's electro-reception organs that they use to navigate

The device clips into the surfboard’s bottom deck and uses an electric field to overwhelm the shark’s electro-reception organs that they use to navigate

Dr McPhee added that although no shark deterrent is 100 percent safe, it’s important that surfers (who are most at risk of shark attacks) understand electric deterrents are considered the most effective.

‘As well as the Rpela V2 we assessed in this study, electric deterrents developed by Ocean Guardian have been tested several times and have been shown to be effective,’ he added.

‘No shark deterrent is 100 percent effective but when independent testing demonstrates a statistically significant reduction in interactions with sharks, consumers can be confident that safety is enhanced.’

The findings were published in the Journal of Marine Science and Technology.  

The study comes as the level of shark attacks have increased on the continent, with 18 unprovoked attacks occurring in Australia in 2020, according to the International Shark Attack File (ISAF), despite the COVID-19 pandemic. 

There were 57 unprovoked cases of shark attacks on humans in 2020, down from the 2015-2019 average of 80 per year.

Despite the low figure, due in part to the COVID-19 pandemic, 10 people died from shark attacks in 2020, the highest figure since 2013, something experts described as ‘an unusually deadly year.’

The ISAF noted, however, that ‘short-term trends still show both fatal and non-fatal bites to be decreasing’ and the higher number of incidents in Australia ‘is not cause for alarm.’ 

The average of unprovoked shark-related fatalities is four per year.

Just over two percent of the known 548 species of sharks have been known to attack humans, but three – bull sharks, great whites and tiger sharks – are responsible for a great majority of them. 

The odds of being killed by a shark in the US are more than 3.7 million to 1 according to the ISAF, with USA Today noting that bees, wasps and dogs kill more people domestically than sharks. 

In July, a study found that Hollywood’s shark movies overwhelmingly portray sharks negatively, hurting conservation efforts.  

HOW SHARKS EARNED THEIR RUTHLESS REPUTATION

Sharks are the most efficient predators on earth and have long terrified humans.

Their basic design has never really changed over the course of 200million years and they are considered to be complex and intelligent.

Their teeth are fear factor number one, with the great white’s teeth growing up to two-and-a-half inches in length.

Their prey are impaled on the pointed teeth of the lower jaw where they saw away sections of the flesh. The serrated edges of the teeth help with this process.

Their teeth are brittle and are constantly breaking off but are also constantly regrowing and on average there are 15 rows of teeth present in the mouth at one time.

Sharks are the most efficient predators on earth. Their basic design has never really changed over the course of 200million years

Sharks are the most efficient predators on earth. Their basic design has never really changed over the course of 200million years

Sharks are the most efficient predators on earth. Their basic design has never really changed over the course of 200million years

Their speed is fear factor number two. 

They are very fast in the water compared to humans with the mako shark able to reach an incredible 60mph in bursts.

The great white can reach speeds of 25mph. 

By comparison, 5mph is the fastest a human being can reach.

A shark’s power and size terrifies us, too.   

The great white shark can grow up to 20 feet and while it has no particular taste for humans even an exploratory bite is enough to cut a man in half.

Most sharks release a human after its first bite but sometimes, that’s all it take to kill a person.   

However, sharks have far more reason to be afraid of humans. We kill up to a million of them a year, often just cutting off their fins to make into soup and throwing the rest of the shark back into the water, where it starves or drowns. 

<!—->

Advertisement

This post first appeared on Dailymail.co.uk

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You May Also Like

Carlsberg is trialling a fully recyclable beer bottle made from WOOD fibres

It’s one of the most popular beers around the world, and if…

46 Best Prime Day Apple Deals (2023)

Discounts on Apple products are few and far between. Luckily, with Amazon’s…

Number of stay-at-home dads is up by a third, UK stats show 

A rise in stay-at-home dads means a third more men are now…

Why Do You Get Sick in the Winter? Blame Your Nose

To figure out what exactly was causing this antiviral capability, the scientists…