PR would make Labour majorities all but impossible, yet give the Lib Dems a permanent foothold on power

  • Richard Johnson is a lecturer in politics at Queen Mary University of London

At Labour’s annual conference this week, a motion is to be put forward calling for the party to back proportional representation (PR) for the election of MPs to the House of Commons.

There are many philosophical arguments that can be made against PR. PR makes coalition governments the norm rather than the exception. It reduces the ability of a party to deliver on its manifesto promises. It gives disproportionate weight to small parties. It encourages a more transactional form of politics, based on post-election horse-trading. It produces a more fragmented, inward-looking form of politics, whereby parties no longer need to seek broad-based electoral support in order to achieve power.

Continue reading…

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You May Also Like

Concerns as cross-sex hormones available online for just £11 a month

Experts fear children questioning their gender may turn to hidden economy to…

Pregnant man and multiracial handshake emojis approved for launch

Additional emojis will complete Unicode’s drive to offer more variety and gender-neutral…

Saudi Arabia’s 2034 ambitious World Cup plans force Fifa into leap of faith

Uncertainties abound over host country’s grand proposals – for both their mind-boggling…

Legal right to wild camp on Dartmoor never existed, court hears

Lawyers for landowner Alexander Darwall argue camping is not explicitly mentioned in…