Analysis: there was no cross-examination of the prince’s friend and his accuser was not called to give evidence

For the Duke of York, the fact he was barely mentioned in Ghislaine Maxwell’s trial will have been an undoubted relief. With Maxwell declining the stand, no opening of her “little black book” of society contacts and, crucially, no sign of his accuser Virginia Roberts Giuffre, Prince Andrew was a mere footnote in the New York proceedings.

Maxwell opted not to give evidence before being found guilty on five of six charges, saying there was “no need” because prosecutors had failed to prove their case, so the subject of Andrew was not raised with her via cross-examination.

Continue reading…

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You May Also Like

Delaying US exit a month could have meant peace in Afghanistan, says negotiator

Biden’s hasty withdrawal removed leverage in talks with Taliban, says first female…

Joe Biden flies to meet British PM and taoiseach on island of Ireland trip

US president arrives in Belfast on Tuesday before flying to Dublin in…

Dominic Raab’s conflicts with staff led to delays in Afghanistan evacuation, sources claim

Raab allegedly allowed only a handful of senior staff to engage with…

The public saw Boris Johnson as warmly authentic, then devious and corrupt | Simon Jenkins

He faced phenomenal challenges but had a disrespect for parliament and the…