Judgment rules ‘jury’s verdict may have been different’ in case of Andrew Malkinson if defence had been given full facts

The conviction of a man who spent 17 years behind bars for a rape he did not commit was unsafe because police withheld crucial information from his defence lawyers, the court of appeal has found.

Andrew Malkinson was wrongly convicted of raping, beating and strangling a woman in 2003 after he was picked out of a police lineup, despite not matching the victim’s description of the attacker.

Continue reading…

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You May Also Like

Chinese city offers cash for clues as Covid outbreak declared a ‘people’s war’

Authorities announced the 100,000 yuan ($15,640) rewards for residents in Heihei, saying…

French rightwing politician calls for Angela Davis school to be renamed

Valérie Pécresse told a committee the Black activist’s belief that racism was…

‘Forever chemical’ in English tap water samples carcinogenic, WHO rules

Exclusive: Move to categorise PFOA as linked to cancer in humans by…

Career stress: the average age of burnout is now 32 – and home working is making it worse

One in three respondents to a survey blamed working from home for…