Readers respond to the the publication of Sue Gray’s pared-down report, and Boris Johnson’s record of mendacity in the Commons and outside of it

Sue Gray’s update omitted any reference to the ministerial code, despite its inclusion in her terms of reference. While the Metropolitan police investigation may have precluded consideration of alleged criminal behaviour, it should not have prevented further examination of her finding of “failures of leadership and judgment” and “a failure to observe … the high standards expected of those working at the heart of government”, in relation to the prime minister himself.

Her reluctance to enter this minefield may well be due to the requirement in the code that “ministers who knowingly mislead parliament will be expected to offer their resignation to the prime minister”. Clearly this is unworkable and is not addressed by Boris Johnson’s proposals for reform, which conveniently refer only to codes of conduct for civil servants and advisers (Johnson creates Office of the Prime Minister after Sue Gray criticism, 31 January).

Continue reading…

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You May Also Like

What happens when an ex-Daily Star journalist applies clickbait tactics to running for election?

Keane Duncan is trying to win the mayorship of North Yorks with…

NI police arrest man in connection with John Caldwell shooting

Suspect detained in Derry after note purportedly from New IRA claims responsibility…

Windfarm windfall set to spark debate about funding of UK monarchy

Demand for leases of land for renewable energy projects is set to…