The Ohio Supreme Court invalidated a fourth legislative redistricting plan on Thursday, saying the commission that drew the maps barely altered the previously rejected version and failed to comply with the state’s new anti-gerrymandering rules.

In a 4-3 decision, the court ordered the Ohio Redistricting Commission to produce yet another map by May 6, three days after the state was initially supposed to hold its legislative primaries.

Election officials have said approved maps must be in place by April 20 to hold a state legislative primary by the latest possible date — Aug. 2. But the court argued that timeline was “speculative” and wouldn’t force their hand to approve new maps.

Feb. 21, 202204:44

Ohio will still hold a May 3 primary for congressional and statewide races, which aren’t affected by the redistricting debate over state Legislature seats.

The back-and-forth is the latest setback in a protracted battle between Republicans who control the Redistricting Commission and the state’s high court, which has positioned itself as determined to enforce the state’s redistricting reforms. The state Supreme Court consists of four Republicans and three Democrats.

After the Ohio Supreme Court rejected the third set of maps and threatened to hold the redistricting commission in contempt of court, the commission appeared to take a different tact in drawing up the legislative boundaries. It hired independent mapmakers — paying them nearly $100,000 — and brought in a mediator. The process was livestreamed, allowing the public to watch the maps drawn in real-time, and voting rights advocates were optimistic the resulting maps would be fair and lawful.

But on the last day of remapping efforts, as the independent mapmakers struggled to meet a court-ordered deadline, the Republican majority on the commission proposed and quickly passed a set of maps a GOP staffer had worked up on the side.

“What began as a ‘historic’ process devolved into the same one-sided partisan map-drawing process that led us to invalidate the previous three plans,” the judges wrote in an unsigned majority opinion Thursday.

Justice Michael P. Donnelly, a Democrat, had even sharper words in a concurring opinion.

“Just when the independent map drawers were perilously close to showing that the difficult was achievable,” he wrote, “the commission’s majority-party members summarily pulled the plug on that process.”

The concurring judges chided members of the commission — particularly Republican Senate President Matt Huffman — for actions they argued slowed and blocked the independent mapmakers from finishing their work.

Some Republican justices argued the state Supreme Court’s orders were an overreach.

“We are stuck in a time loop, like the characters in the movie Groundhog Day,” wrote Justice Sharon Kennedy in a dissenting opinion. “The majority’s continued denial of the limitation of this court’s power may end up costing the taxpayers millions of dollars.”

Jen Miller, executive director of the League of Women Voters of Ohio, said she was hopeful the latest decision would prove effective in the end. The League is one of the plaintiffs who have repeatedly challenged the commission’s maps.

“Bottom line, our priority is fair maps,” Miller told NBC News. “All I can do is remain hopeful.”

This is the first redistricting process since the state implemented a new commission process that consists of asking a bipartisan group of state officials to come up with state legislative maps that are compact and not designed to boost one party over the other. Deeply-rooted partisanship, however, has stymied the prospects for compromise sought by advocates.

The costs of the failed attempts are adding up: On top of the nearly $100,000 paid to mapmakers, taxpayers will now have to fund a second primary. State lawmakers opted not to move the state’s May 3 primary for statewide and congressional races, which means the state will need to host a second primary for the legislative races, costing taxpayers approximately $20 million, Minority House Leader Allison Russo, a Democrat on the commission, told NBC News.

Source: | This article originally belongs to Nbcnews.com

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You May Also Like

Western Nations Discuss Price Caps on Russian Oil Products

Politics The West prepares to impose caps for diesel and fuel oil…

Justice Department, EPA Sue Norfolk Southern

U.S. Government alleges discharged hazardous substances violate the Clean Water Act This…

New York attorney general sues NYPD to install monitor, alleges years of civil rights abuses

New York Attorney General Letitia James has sued the city of New…

‘Is this real?’ HBCUs are wiping out student debt

The Covid-19 pandemic has disproportionately impacted the finances of many Black Americans,…