Instead of siphoning off profits to private shareholders, state utility companies could tackle the cost of living and climate crisis

Yesterday morning, Rachel Reeves was drawn into stating on the Today programme that a Labour government would not bring rail, energy and water into public ownership. Then followed a number of tweets from Labour’s shadow transport ministers, reaffirming the party’s commitment to nationalising the railway. By the afternoon, Keir Starmer had confirmed that rail would indeed be brought into public ownership because this was “pragmatic”, but water and energy would not.

While Starmer claims the pragmatism of the policy rests on the fact that some of the rail network is already in public hands, the more relevant issue is that Labour is terrified of buying back assets. Bringing contracts (like rail franchises) into public ownership when they come to an end is generally cost-free whereas buying back water and energy companies involves compensating shareholders – and Jeremy Corbyn was hammered for this in the 2019 election.

Cat Hobbs is the founder of We Own It, an organisation that campaigns for public ownership of public services

Do you have an opinion on the issues raised in this article? If you would like to submit a letter of up to 300 words to be considered for publication, email it to us at [email protected]

Continue reading…

You May Also Like

Nice recommends use of AI in NHS radiotherapy treatment in England

Nine technologies approved for carrying out external beam radiotherapy in lung, prostate…

Suspending the pensions triple lock is bad news for young people | Craig Berry

A one-off boost to pensions now isn’t unfair if it means greater…

One death, 11 jailed teenagers: was a Moss Side murder trial racist?

In 2017, 11 Manchester teenagers were jailed for a total of 168…

‘He has done more to further the cause of hate in the US than almost anyone’: the rise and fall of Alex Jones

For years, the Infowars provocateur has made millions of dollars spreading lies…