We have to act on the Rwandan regime’s human rights abuses, but withholding aid is unlikely to help the general population, writes Stijn Kuipers

Michela Wrong’s exposure of human rights abuses under Rwandan president Paul Kagame is a service to the world. Her suggestion that we should therefore withhold aid, however, is not (‘We choose good guys and bad guys’: beneath the myth of ‘model’ Rwanda, 19 March). I wish the west’s development paradigm was as apolitical and “sinister” as she describes it, as that would make it easy to solve. In reality, the development field has become much more politically conscious in recent years. The problem is that this has made the work more complex.

For example, in 2014 the Dutch government halted aid to Uganda in response to a proposed anti-homosexuality law, arguably acting morally. However, Ugandan LGBTQ+ organisations were not very happy with the Dutch response, as they predicted that LGBTQ+ people would have an even harder time in society if aid projects were cancelled and they received the blame.

Continue reading…

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You May Also Like

Water quality worries hang over Durban months after deadly flooding

Beaches open and close as E coli levels fluctuate, leaving local South…

UK Covid vaccinations for children aged 12-15: what you need to know

Why have the chief medical officers said children need a jab? What…

Windsor protest

ambassador bridge live, windsor bridge, protesters ambassador bridge