A Georgia judge said Tuesday that he would not make any “rash decisions” on whether to release a report by a special grand jury on its investigation into whether then-President Donald Trump and his allies unlawfully attempted to interfere with the 2020 election results.

Fulton County Superior Court Judge Robert McBurney said he would rule at a later date and reach out with any questions on the points made by the Fulton County district attorney’s office and news organizations on the grand jury’s report, which is expected to include recommendations on possible criminal prosecution.

District Attorney Fani Willis argued that the disclosure of the report could violate the rights of potential defendants and could negatively affect the ability to prosecute those who may be charged with crimes. She said the special grand jury heard from a total of 75 witnesses during the course of the investigation.

“We want to make sure that everyone is treated fairly and we think for future defendants to be treated fairly, it is not appropriate at this time for this report to be released,” Willis said.

If McBurney ultimately decides to disseminate the recently completed report, as the special grand jury urged, he must also determine whether any parts of it should be redacted.

A coalition of news organizations, including the Associated Press, argued in favor of the report’s release in full, saying in a filing Monday that the document “is a court record subject to a presumption of openness” under state court rules and the state and federal constitutions. The media group said public interest in the report is “extraordinary” and there “are no countervailing interests sufficient to overcome the presumption.”

Attorneys representing Trump in the investigation, meanwhile, told NBC News that they would not participate in Tuesday’s hearing and asserted that Trump had never been never subpoenaed or asked to voluntarily testify before the grand jury. 

McBurney, who was overseeing the panel, issued an order Monday dissolving the special grand jury. The order says the grand jurors completed a final report and that a majority of the county's superior court judges voted to dissolve the special grand jury.
Superior Court Judge Robert McBurney on May 2, 2022 in Fulton County, Ga. Ben Gray / AP

In their statement, Trump’s attorneys make no mention of any intention to fight the release of the report. “Therefore, we can assume that the grand jury did their job and looked at the facts and the law, as we have, and concluded there were no violations of the law by President Trump,” they said.

Prosecutors argued in court Tuesday that a discussion about whether to release the report should occur after the district attorney’s office has decided whether to seek charges. The district attorney’s office is not opposed to the eventual public release of the report, said prosecutor Donald Wakeford, but “it is opposed to it right now.”

The original order granting Willis’ request for a special grand jury authorized the panel to “make recommendations concerning criminal prosecution as it shall see fit.” But it’s unclear just how specific those recommendations will be. The special grand jury did not have the power to issue indictments, and it will ultimately be up to Willis to decide whether to seek indictments from a regular grand jury.

A grand jury handbook produced by the Prosecuting Attorneys’ Council of Georgia says courts have repeatedly held that a grand jury “cannot include, in a report or general presentment, comments that charge or accuse identifiable person(s) of misconduct.” That can only be done in a charging document, like an indictment, the handbook says.

Willis called for the special grand jury last year because it has the authority to issue subpoenas for witnesses to testify. The panel has heard testimony from multiple figures in Trump’s inner circle, including attorney Rudy Giuliani and Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C. Top Georgia officials, such as Gov. Brian Kemp and Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger — both Republicans whom Trump and his allies tried to pressure into overturning the 2020 election results — also testified.

Willis opened the investigation in early 2021 after a recording surfaced of a phone call that January between Trump and Raffensperger. The then-president pressed Raffensperger to “find” the votes needed to overturn Joe Biden’s victory in the 2020 election.

“All I want to do is this. I just want to find 11,780 votes, which is one more than we have. Because we won the state,” Trump said in the call.

In a post on his social media platform, Trump on Tuesday repeated his oft-stated claim that the call was “PERFECT, nothing done or said wrong.”

Dareh Gregorian and Blayne Alexander contributed.

Source: | This article originally belongs to Nbcnews.com

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You May Also Like

What we know about the killing of the N.Y. woman who was shot after pulling into the wrong driveway

A 20-year-old woman with dreams of becoming a marine biologist was fatally…

Appeals court rules against Trump in fight over Jan. 6 committee documents request

A federal appeals court ruled Thursday that former President Donald Trump cannot…

U.S. Retail Spending Likely Advanced Again in April

U.S. shoppers likely increased spending at retailers in April, as the recovery…

13-year-old Minnesota youth set to graduate from college

MINNEAPOLIS (AP) — A 13-year-old boy from Minnesota will soon earn his…