Nutritional supplement company Bountiful Co. will pay $600,000 following Federal Trade Commission allegations that it made products on Amazon look like they had more reviews and higher average ratings than they really did. 

The FTC said the case marks its first enforcement action against a practice called “review hijacking,” in which a marketer makes reviews for one product appear to apply to another.

Bountiful, whose brands include Nature’s Bounty vitamins and others, merged listings for its Stress Comfort supplements and other products on Amazon.com with those for different products that already had ratings, reviews and badges such as “#1 Best Seller” or “Amazon’s Choice,” the commission said.

The FTC said Bountiful took advantage of an Amazon feature that lets vendors create or request to create “variation” relationships between products that are similar but differ in narrow ways like color, size, quantity or flavor. Products considered variations share the same product page on Amazon as alternate choices, such as a T-shirt offered in multiple colors.

In 2021, Nestlé SA’s health science unit acquired core Bountiful brands.

“Boosting your products by hijacking another product’s ratings or reviews is a relatively new tactic, but is still plain old false advertising,” said Samuel Levine, director of the FTC’s Bureau of Consumer Protection. 

Bountiful said it had settled with the FTC to avoid “a lengthy and costly legal challenge.” 

“We stand behind our products and business practices and are convinced that consumers were neither deceived nor harmed by the variation practices implemented to assist consumers in finding similar products,” the company said. “Bountiful is already complying with the terms of the order and will continue to do so.”

Bountiful will pay the $600,000 under the FTC’s proposed order, which also prohibits the company from creating “variation relationships” that distort what consumers think about its products or services. The FTC said the decision to accept the proposed consent agreement was unanimous, with the commission voting 4-0 in favor of doing so. The proposed agreement will be subject to public comment for 30 days, after which the FTC will decide whether to make it final. 

A spokesperson for Amazon.com Inc. said it would continue to assist enforcement agencies in “holding bad actors accountable.” Amazon said sellers have the ability to directly update their listings and that its policies prohibit listing incorrect information on a product’s page.

Robert Freund, an attorney focused on advertising and e-commerce issues at Robert Freund Law, said the FTC has taken a closer look at customer reviews as they have grown in importance for consumers making purchasing decisions.

“Because high star-rating or average review rating or a large number of positive reviews [are] so influential in terms of sales, there’s a temptation to engage in deceptive practices like this,” Mr. Freund said. 

Though Amazon has been active in pursuit of fake review sellers, Mr. Freund said problems remain. 

“They’ve done litigation sweeps against thousands of sellers who organize Facebook groups to pay for reviews and things like that, but nonetheless, it’s a really hard problem to completely stamp out,” he said. “It’s not easy for a consumer to really be able to understand what’s authentic and what isn’t, even with the controls and monitoring that Amazon has.”

Write to Megan Graham at [email protected]

Copyright ©2022 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 87990cbe856818d5eddac44c7b1cdeb8

This post first appeared on wsj.com

You May Also Like

Ron DeSantis bets big on his Disney feud

LAKE COUNTY, Fla. — Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis has heard plenty of…

Biden to Nominate María Pagán as U.S. Envoy to WTO

WASHINGTON—President Biden is expected to nominate María Luisa Pagán, a longtime government…

House Hunting in Russia: Green and Modern on the Gulf of Finland

A Five-Bedroom Villa With an Indoor Pool in Russia $4.9 MILLION (371…

How Haley Went From Friend to Foe of U.S. Boeing Aid

NORTH CHARLESTON, S.C.—Nikki Haley frequently questions the use of public money to…