The Australian auteur’s films are intoxicating, polarising spectacles – so from the very bad (Australia) to the very good, we rank his works across film and TV

As we know from having had our senses pounded by various glitter-filled, hyperactive and blindingly bright spectacles, Baz Luhrmann’s films don’t talk – they shout. The Sydney-born auteur practises a film-making ethos he and veteran editor Jill Billcock (who cut his first three films: the “red curtain trilogy”) sagely described as “frame fucking”.

Luhrmann is a polarising director, as everybody and their dog have pointed out. The trick to making sense of Luhrmann is to understand that he doesn’t really consciously manipulate, or even necessarily believe in, subtext. Everything is always on the surface. There are broad, agreed upon meanings – for instance, Romeo + Juliet and his new film Elvis are obviously tragedies. Problems arise when his work cries out for considered layering of themes and messages, only for viewers to discover there is always little under the bonnet.

Continue reading…

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You May Also Like

The Guardian view on the care home sector: trouble looms as rents rise | Editorial

An inflationary environment makes care home collapses more probable, given the way…

How Clogs Clomped Back Into Style (Seriously)

PLATFORM FOR CHANGE From left: A clogged trio in 1972 captures the…

Firm behind Wegovy slimming jab suspended from UK trade association

Novo Nordisk found to be in breach of ABPI code of practice…

Correspondent abruptly leaves CNN after calling Trump a ‘demagogue’

John Harwood is out as the company’s new head signals shift away…