For the second time since the trial of Elizabeth Holmes began, the jury heard testimony Tuesday that Theranos Inc. altered a document to show investors that its technology had been validated by a major pharmaceutical company.

Constance Cullen, an immunology expert who helped lead test development at pharmaceutical firm Schering-Plough Corp. , testified that she had been unimpressed with Theranos and found Ms. Holmes “cagey” during her process of evaluating the startup’s technology for a possible partnership. Despite that, prosecutors say, Theranos put Schering-Plough’s logo on a document it later gave to a prospective business partner and investor, purporting that the pharmaceutical company had checked out and validated its blood-testing devices.

This post first appeared on wsj.com

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You May Also Like

U.S. sues Texas over Abbott order restricting transportation of undocumented immigrants

WASHINGTON — The Justice Department sued Texas and Republican Gov. Greg Abbott…

Democrats Face Intraparty Fight on Minimum Wage

WASHINGTON—Democrats are bracing for an internal battle over raising the minimum wage…

China Leads the Way With Private 5G Networks at Industrial Facilities

China is racing ahead in building the infrastructure of 5G networks, but…

At least 20 dead, 600 wounded in Equatorial Guinea blasts

OUAGADOUGOU, Burkina Faso — A series of explosions at a military barracks…