We must broaden the voices and stories studied, writes Zaahida Nabagereka, while Vaughan Melzer asks how many stories of success does any working-class child see

Troy Deeney is absolutely right that we need to diversify the curriculum to better represent our society (My teacher said I’d more likely be dead by 25 than a footballer. What if I had listened?, 23 May). The books on the English literature curriculum do not represent the lives of young people. Although 34% of school-age children in England identify as Black, Asian or minority ethnic, our nationwide research shows fewer than 1% of GCSE English literature students study a book by a writer of colour.

This isn’t about removing important writers from the curriculum; classic writers will always have a place. But we must broaden the voices and stories studied. Far too few young people currently see themselves in what they read.

Continue reading…

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You May Also Like

Record number of renters seeking help with no-fault evictions

Citizens Advice says landlords may be issuing section 21 notices before practice…

Wednesday briefing: Johnson and Von der Leyen make a meal over deal

Three-course menu of fishing, governance and ‘level playing field’ … dementia tragedy…

Boris Johnson’s ‘jet zero’ carbon flight goal dismissed as a gimmick

Experts says technology alone will not get close to solving aviation’s emissions…

Florida rejects 54 math textbooks over ‘prohibited topics’ including critical race theory

Move follows a series of hardline measures by Republicans in the state…