Let’s hope E.ON, Centrica and Scottish Power’s judicial reviews succeed in forcing some openness

Selling a nationalised energy supplier, even one with 1.5 million customers, ought to be a simple process. First, you invite bids. Second, you assess the proposals, weighing them against criteria such as deliverability, value for money for taxpayers and likelihood of increasing competition. Third – and this is the critical bit – you explain your decision.

With Bulb, even as a court on Wednesday approved the transfer to Octopus Energy, we’re still none the wiser about the main financial points. Octopus is said to be paying £100m to £200m but no minister has confirmed the figure. Nor do we know why Octopus was chosen, or the size of the financial assistance being advanced from public coffers to enable the buyer to complete the deal.

Continue reading…

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You May Also Like

NRA files for bankruptcy and seeks to incorporate in Texas

Gun rights group claims to be in strong financial condition New York…

UK facing ‘brain drain’ of cancer researchers after failure to join EU scheme

Delay joining the Horizon Europe programme making it more difficult to attract…

Trump lawyers ask judge to push election subversion trial to April 2026

Ex-president’s team seek to delay start date more than two years from…