The final monthly payments of the expanded child tax credit authorized under current law hit bank accounts Wednesday. A one-year extension of that break is a central plank of Democrats’ package, and the Internal Revenue Service has told lawmakers that they must extend the program by Dec. 28 to keep January’s payments on track, a deadline that party leaders have aimed to meet.

But Democrats face two major obstacles to meeting that timeline. They are grappling with time-consuming parliamentary challenges to the bill’s measures on drug pricing and immigration, among other issues, and trying to address Sen. Joe Manchin’s continued skepticism of the bill. Democrats will need Mr. Manchin’s support to pass the bill in the 50-50 Senate, where all Republicans are opposed.

President Biden has spoken repeatedly this week with Mr. Manchin (D., W.Va.), who has questioned the overall design of Democrats’ legislation.

Fully resolving Mr. Manchin’s concerns about Democrats choosing to fund a variety of programs temporarily—rather than a smaller selection permanently—would necessitate a large-scale overhaul of the bill passed by the House last month. Mr. Manchin said this week he was discussing different iterations of the legislation with Mr. Biden.

Mr. Biden said Wednesday that he was unsure if Democrats could pass the bill this year.

“I hope so. It’s going to be close,” he said.

The possible lapse in the child tax credit payments has alarmed many Democrats, who warn that millions of children would fall back into poverty or deeper into poverty if they don’t act. House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D., Calif.) said on Wednesday that the possible lapse should motivate Democrats to quickly pass the bill, which Democrats call Build Back Better.

“I think that is really important leverage in a discussion on BBB that the children and their families will suffer without that payment,” she said.

Sen. Joe Manchin, center, has expressed continued skepticism of the Democrats’ bill.

Photo: Jacquelyn Martin/Associated Press

With unanimous Republican opposition to the broader bill, the credit’s advocates are trying to sway Mr. Manchin, who has at times called for more restrictive income caps and work requirements. Those efforts, which include pointing out the depth of child poverty in West Virginia and emphasizing that grandparents raising children may not have income, have so far not convinced the Senate’s pivotal voter.

“He is not, at this moment, a fan of the child tax credit,” Sen. Michael Bennet (D., Colo.) said of Mr. Manchin.

Democrats expanded the credit in March, turning a $2,000 annual tax break for most families into a larger monthly child allowance for almost all families.

The credit is now $3,000 a year and $3,600 for children under age 6. It’s fully refundable, which means families can get the entire credit instead of a partial payment. Starting in July, the IRS began making the payments monthly, creating a steady stream of income for parents.

All those changes expire at the end of this year, and Democrats have struggled to bring Mr. Manchin on board.

To accommodate his concerns about the overall cost of the legislation, Democratic leaders abandoned attempts for a multiyear extension. The House-passed bill would extend the credit through 2022 and make permanent the full refundability.

But that approach ran into another of Mr. Manchin’s problems with the legislation—the way it pairs short-term expiring programs with long-term tax increases.

The child credit dispute isn’t the only problem Democrats must overcome to get the legislation through the Senate. They are working through the restrictions imposed by the procedure known as budget reconciliation that they are using to advance the bill on a simple majority vote in the evenly divided Senate.

Before the bill reaches the floor, lawmakers from both parties argue in closed-door meetings with the Senate parliamentarian. Republicans can challenge particular provisions as falling outside reconciliation’s parameters, which generally require a fiscal focus. Democratic attempts to address pharmaceutical prices and immigration could fall out of the bill or get limited as a result of this process.

While Democrats hoped to hold the final set of arguments over the parliamentary issues this week, some committees aren’t expected to begin their bipartisan meetings with the parliamentarian until this weekend, according to aides. Lawmakers won’t have a final sense of the legislation until that process completes, and Mr. Manchin has said he is waiting to see the bill’s completed text.

Democrats also haven’t reached an internal agreement over what to do with the state and local tax deduction. The House bill would raise the cap on that tax break to $80,000 from $10,000, starting with tax year 2021. Senate progressives such as Bernie Sanders (I., Vt.) have been negotiating with lawmakers from high-tax states such as Robert Menendez (D., N.J.) about a lower cap and an income limit.

Even if Democrats extend the child tax credit through 2022, they will be right back in the same position trying to extend it further a year from now.

Mr. Biden has said further extensions would need to be paid for with other measures, but the most obvious approach—raising tax rates on corporations and high-income households—was blocked in the current bill by Sen. Kyrsten Sinema (D., Ariz.). Democrats could again face that opposition in any future attempts to raise revenue.

Republicans are unlikely to offer much help. Even some who fought to expand the credit in 2017, such as Sen. Marco Rubio (R., Fla.), have criticized the removal of minimum-income requirements.

“I wish we could get one Republican to help us help 2.2 million kids in our state who benefited from it but we haven’t had any Republican help,” said Sen. Bob Casey (D., Pa.). March’s law “got us to one year. Build Back Better will get us a second year. We’ve got to come up with a vehicle to come up with a third, fourth, whatever.”

Sen. Bill Cassidy (R., La.) said he favored continuing monthly payments to help low-income families with budgeting but opposed the higher amounts. He cited concerns about the larger payments potentially keeping people out of the workforce, citing the importance of parents working as an example for children.

“If you take the whole picture, the cost benefit does not favor continuing the program as the Democrats currently constructed it,” he said.

Write to Richard Rubin at [email protected] and Andrew Duehren at [email protected]

The Democrats’ Budget Plan

Copyright ©2021 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 87990cbe856818d5eddac44c7b1cdeb8

This post first appeared on wsj.com

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You May Also Like

Behind Trump’s sudden Covid vaccine evangelism

FLORENCE, Ariz. — When former President Donald Trump told his supporters to…

Photos show damage from Indonesia earthquake as death toll rises to at least 252

The death toll from an earthquake on the Indonesian island of Java…

Fed’s Message on Rate Path, Destination Will Be Scrutinized

Investors tuning into Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell’s news conference Wednesday will…

U.K. Leader Liz Truss Battles to Hang On After Budget U-Turn

LONDON—Having fired her chancellor of the exchequer days ago, U.K. Prime Minister…