A judge denied a court petition by Ben & Jerry’s independent board members that sought to stop parent Unilever PLC from transferring assets to a local licensee in Israel—a setback for the ice cream brand in an unusual legal fight between a wholly owned subsidiary and its corporate owner.

A judge for the Southern District of New York ruled Monday that Ben & Jerry’s had failed to demonstrate irreparable harm in its request for a preliminary injunction against Unilever. Ben & Jerry’s board members earlier this month had asked the court to stop Unilever from making the transfer, arguing in a court hearing that the move could allow the brand’s products to be used to oppose social issues that it supports.

This post first appeared on wsj.com

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You May Also Like

Meadows and other ex-Trump aides must testify before Jan. 6 grand jury, judge rules

A federal judge has ruled that some of former President Donald Trump’s…

China’s President Xi Jinping Personally Scuttled Jack Ma’s Ant IPO

Chinese President Xi Jinping personally made the decision to halt the initial…

Democrats’ Minimum Tax Unlikely to Vanish, So Businesses Seek to Soften Its Impact

WASHINGTON—Congress is poised to create a new corporate minimum tax, and pension…

U.S. air strike in Syria on Iranian-backed militia killed one fighter, wounded two, says Pentagon

WASHINGTON — The Pentagon said Monday that a U.S. air strike last…