Critics of retired supreme court justice say QALYs measure not intended for public health debate

Seven years before Lord Sumption found himself at the centre of a media storm over his apparent suggestion that the life of a woman with stage 4 cancer was “less valuable”, the former supreme court justice wrote a judgment that seemed to take a very different view.

In 2014, addressing the Tony Nicklinson case in a decision which upheld a ban on doctors helping patients to end their lives, he called the sanctity of life a “fundamental moral value”.

Continue reading…

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You May Also Like

Chelsea crowned world champions after Kai Havertz penalty sinks Palmeiras

Chelsea (Lukaku 55, Havertz 117pen) 2-1 Palmeiras (Veiga 64pen) Blues beat 10-man…

The social app Clubhouse is an invitation to trouble | John Naughton

The startup’s invitation-only model gives it a sheen of exclusivity, but privacy…

Premier League confirms scrapping of controversial pay-per-view model

Fans will not be charged £14.95 to watch games for rest of…