Critics of retired supreme court justice say QALYs measure not intended for public health debate

Seven years before Lord Sumption found himself at the centre of a media storm over his apparent suggestion that the life of a woman with stage 4 cancer was “less valuable”, the former supreme court justice wrote a judgment that seemed to take a very different view.

In 2014, addressing the Tony Nicklinson case in a decision which upheld a ban on doctors helping patients to end their lives, he called the sanctity of life a “fundamental moral value”.

Continue reading…

You May Also Like

The royal we: subtle transition as ageing Queen devolves more duties

Other royals are stepping up, including at Cop26, as a monarch who…

‘Climate change has become real’: extreme weather sinks prime US tourism site

At Lake Powell on the Arizona-Utah border, the water line has dropped…

Nottinghamshire police and crime chief caught speeding five times in 12 weeks

Caroline Henry was elected to the post of PCC using the slogan…