Let’s hope E.ON, Centrica and Scottish Power’s judicial reviews succeed in forcing some openness

Selling a nationalised energy supplier, even one with 1.5 million customers, ought to be a simple process. First, you invite bids. Second, you assess the proposals, weighing them against criteria such as deliverability, value for money for taxpayers and likelihood of increasing competition. Third – and this is the critical bit – you explain your decision.

With Bulb, even as a court on Wednesday approved the transfer to Octopus Energy, we’re still none the wiser about the main financial points. Octopus is said to be paying £100m to £200m but no minister has confirmed the figure. Nor do we know why Octopus was chosen, or the size of the financial assistance being advanced from public coffers to enable the buyer to complete the deal.

Continue reading…

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You May Also Like

UK politics live: public sector pay rises next year could be lower than inflation, minister admits

Latest updates: Paul Scully says pay review bodies will determine ‘appropriate rise’…

World risks new age of empires where might makes right, warns Estonian foreign minister

International institutions seem powerless in face of Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, writes…

North Yorkshire RNLI crew issues flare plea after Christmas Day search

Whitby crew urges people not to set off flares in non-emergencies after…

Tory MP to boycott England games in row over taking the knee

Lee Anderson says team risks alienating fans as Southgate says players ‘more…