A judge denied a court petition by Ben & Jerry’s independent board members that sought to stop parent Unilever PLC from transferring assets to a local licensee in Israel—a setback for the ice cream brand in an unusual legal fight between a wholly owned subsidiary and its corporate owner.

A judge for the Southern District of New York ruled Monday that Ben & Jerry’s had failed to demonstrate irreparable harm in its request for a preliminary injunction against Unilever. Ben & Jerry’s board members earlier this month had asked the court to stop Unilever from making the transfer, arguing in a court hearing that the move could allow the brand’s products to be used to oppose social issues that it supports.

This post first appeared on wsj.com

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You May Also Like

Democrats say impeachment trial won’t impede Covid relief work

WASHINGTON — Top Senate Democrats said Tuesday that they’re not going to…

Mississippi ‘Goon Squad’ ex-deputy gets 20-year sentence in racist torture of 2 Black men

JACKSON, Miss. — A former Mississippi sheriff’s deputy who was part of…

Musk Aims to Boost Twitter Revenue With Subscriptions

Tech In a series of tweets, he wrote the social-media company needs…

Workers Are Happier Than They’ve Been in Decades

May 11, 2023 5:30 am ET Listen (2 min) Job satisfaction hit…