Analysis: First minister is seeking supreme court ruling but experts say there is ‘nothing new’ in her request

There have always been three routes to a second referendum on Scottish independence and, despite the buildup and rhetoric around Tuesday’s statement, they remain unchanged – a section 30 order from the UK government; risking a domestic boycott and international opprobrium with a wildcat vote; or putting a referendum bill to the Holyrood parliament and facing down an almost inevitable court challenge.

Nicola Sturgeon told MSPs on Tuesday afternoon that she had written to Boris Johnson again, the latest of repeated requests for a section 30 order under the 1998 Scotland Act that would grant Holyrood the competence to legislate for another referendum. The previous one happened in 2014 and it is a process described as the “gold standard” by the first minister.

Continue reading…

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You May Also Like

Terror suspect escape prompts furious political row over prison cuts

Government facing questions about state of criminal justice system as search for…

Corey Hall try completes Wakefield’s Challenge Cup comeback at Warrington

Warrington 12-16 Wakefield Trinity will play Wigan in quarter-finals It was John…

I’m a Tory MP, but I know Rishi Sunak’s claims about the cost of net zero are false | Chris Skidmore

The economy will thrive under the energy transition, not suffer. So why…