If we can’t dramatically cut meat consumption then intensive ‘factory farming’ may be comparatively less risky, say authors

The industrial farming of animals such as pigs, poultry and cattle to provide meat for hundreds of millions of people may reduce the risk of pandemics and the emergence of dangerous diseases including Sars, BSE, bird flu and Covid-19 compared with less-intensive farming, a major study by vets and ecologists has found.

Despite reports from the UN and other bodies in the wake of Covid linking the intensive farming of livestock to the spread of zoonotic (animal-borne) diseases, the authors argue that “non-intensive” or “low-yield” farms pose a more serious risk to human health because they require far more land to produce the same amount of food.

Continue reading…

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You May Also Like

‘Nobody has told us anything’: Bibby Stockholm residents prepare for ‘boring’ Christmas

Asylum seekers living on the vessel moored in Portland, Dorset say they…

In Hong Kong it now looks like opposition is against the law

Mass arrests raise question of what, if anything, dissenting politicians are actually…

Everton in crisis and a pair of Premier League classics – Football Weekly

Max Rushden is joined by Barry Glendenning, Barney Ronay and John Brewin…