Readers respond to the the publication of Sue Gray’s pared-down report, and Boris Johnson’s record of mendacity in the Commons and outside of it

Sue Gray’s update omitted any reference to the ministerial code, despite its inclusion in her terms of reference. While the Metropolitan police investigation may have precluded consideration of alleged criminal behaviour, it should not have prevented further examination of her finding of “failures of leadership and judgment” and “a failure to observe … the high standards expected of those working at the heart of government”, in relation to the prime minister himself.

Her reluctance to enter this minefield may well be due to the requirement in the code that “ministers who knowingly mislead parliament will be expected to offer their resignation to the prime minister”. Clearly this is unworkable and is not addressed by Boris Johnson’s proposals for reform, which conveniently refer only to codes of conduct for civil servants and advisers (Johnson creates Office of the Prime Minister after Sue Gray criticism, 31 January).

Continue reading…

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You May Also Like

The cult of Putin in Serbia reflects a nation that has still not dealt with its past

In this, one of a series of essays on the war in…

Mississippi governor refuses to rule out banning contraception

‘That is not what we’re focused on at this time,’ says Tate…

Vaccin COVID rendez-vous

rendez vous vaccin covid

‘Indefensible’: UK prisoner jailed for 23 months killed himself after being held for 17 years

Coroner condemns ‘inhumane’ imprisonment for public protection sentences that have no end…