Readers respond to the the publication of Sue Gray’s pared-down report, and Boris Johnson’s record of mendacity in the Commons and outside of it

Sue Gray’s update omitted any reference to the ministerial code, despite its inclusion in her terms of reference. While the Metropolitan police investigation may have precluded consideration of alleged criminal behaviour, it should not have prevented further examination of her finding of “failures of leadership and judgment” and “a failure to observe … the high standards expected of those working at the heart of government”, in relation to the prime minister himself.

Her reluctance to enter this minefield may well be due to the requirement in the code that “ministers who knowingly mislead parliament will be expected to offer their resignation to the prime minister”. Clearly this is unworkable and is not addressed by Boris Johnson’s proposals for reform, which conveniently refer only to codes of conduct for civil servants and advisers (Johnson creates Office of the Prime Minister after Sue Gray criticism, 31 January).

Continue reading…

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You May Also Like

Sean Connery had dementia, his wife reveals

Micheline Roquebrune says the late James Bond actor’s dementia ‘took its toll…

Grieving daughter wins first stage of legal fight on Covid releases to care homes

Cathy Gardner granted full hearing in case against government over hospital discharges…

Ramadan starts for Muslims around the world – in pictures

Around one quarter of the world’s population expected to observe the Islamic…

FBI report shows stark increase in US hate crimes and drop in violent crime

New statistics for 2022 show decrease in violent offenses and rise in…