Western training and weaponry have unquestionably helped Ukraine. Yet the risks of pouring more arms into Ukraine should be considered carefully

The United States and some of its Nato allies – Britain, Poland and the Baltic trio – have been the most vigorous in insisting that Ukraine must, for moral and strategic reasons, receive the weapons it needs to fight Russian aggression.

The moral case, strengthened by Ukrainians’ valiant resistance and President Volodymyr Zelenskiy’s Churchillian wartime leadership, is that Ukraine is the victim, Russia the aggressor.

Rajan Menon is the director of the Grand Strategy Program at Defense Priorities and senior research fellow at the Saltzman Institute of War and Peace Studies at Columbia University

Continue reading…

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You May Also Like

Ukraine war briefing: Fraught path through US Congress for aid as Russia makes gains

Invaders breaking out and making headway in absence of US help, says…

Almost fifth of lone Albanian child refugees in Kent missing, says council

39 of 197 unaccompanied children taken in between 1 January and 31…

Russian strike on Ukraine city kills five, damaging hotel frequented by journalists

Pokrovsk attack leaves at least 31 injured, with hotel and pizzeria damaged…

The SVB debacle has exposed the hypocrisy of Silicon Valley | John Naughton

US tech innovators have a culture of regarding government as an innovation-blocking…