Earl Spencer’s claims might seem like ancient history, but they show the human cost of commodifying women in the public eye

If it happened today, we’d call it gaslighting.

There’s surely no other word for playing on someone’s darkest suspicions, planting seeds of doubt that could only leave her more bewildered about whom to trust. It would be a scandal now if it was alleged that a journalist had secured an interview with an emotionally fragile woman – for everyone knew Princess Diana’s history of eating disorders, her belief the palace was out to get her, the tales of her trying to throw herself down the stairs as her marriage imploded – after showing members of her family forged bank statements supposedly “proving” that her closest aides were being paid to spy on her.

Continue reading…

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You May Also Like

The Long Call review – a hefty whodunnit for autumn nights

From the makers of Vera, this new drama brings together a troubled…

The gap between reckless Brexit promises and reality will soon be too big to ignore | John Harris

Voters invested hope in the idea of leaving the EU. But a…

Myanmar junta attack on school condemned as child death toll rises to 11

UN chief António Guterres criticises airstrikes on Let Yet Kone, which junta…

Omicron news is boost for Boris Johnson but Tory pressure is still on

Analysis: PM will be hoping hospital and other data will be enough…