Wearing a face mask during intense exercise is safe for healthy people, according to the results of a new study.

Italian researchers tested breathing ability, heart activity and exercise performance in a group of 12 healthy people while they were using an exercise bike with and without a mask on.

Although the experts found differences in some measurements between wearing a mask and not wearing a mask, there were no signs that wearing a mask during exercise presents any risk to health.  

Mask use during exercise causes ‘modest respiratory discomfort’, but for people of full health their use is safe even during maximal exercise, the authors claim.

It should be noted that they only tested healthy people, and anyone with respiratory problems should not combine exercise with wearing a face mask.  

Despite their conclusions, the World Health Organisation (WHO) stresses that no one, healthy or otherwise, should wear a mask when exercising. 

Wearing a protective face mask has only a modest effect on the ability of healthy people to do vigorous exercise, according to the study published today .The researchers say: 'exercise ventilatory limitation is far from being reached ... [mask use] is safe even during maximal exercise, with a slight reduction in performance'

Wearing a protective face mask has only a modest effect on the ability of healthy people to do vigorous exercise, according to the study published today .The researchers say: 'exercise ventilatory limitation is far from being reached ... [mask use] is safe even during maximal exercise, with a slight reduction in performance'

Wearing a protective face mask has only a modest effect on the ability of healthy people to do vigorous exercise, according to the study published today .The researchers say: ‘exercise ventilatory limitation is far from being reached … [mask use] is safe even during maximal exercise, with a slight reduction in performance’

Overall, the new research suggests that masks could be worn safely during intense exercise to reduce Covid-19 transmission, for example between people visiting an indoor gym.

Gyms can reopen in England from April 12 and in Scotland from April 26 as part of the gradual removal of lockdown measures.

Although gyms won’t make people wear masks when they’re working out, some chains may enforce mask-wearing when people are entering the gym and in communal areas like changing rooms. 

One author on the new study said it’s possible that breathing harder during exercise could facilitate transmission, especially indoors. 

WHAT’S WHO’S ADVICE?

The conclusions of this new study could form conclusions that go against the World Health Organisation (WHO), which stresses that people should NOT wear masks when exercising.

WHO says masks can reduce the ability to breathe comfortably and get wetter faster from sweat and exhaled respiratory droplets.

This, WHO claims, makes it more difficult to breathe and promotes the growth of microorganisms.  

<!—->

Advertisement

‘We know that the main route of transmission for coronavirus is via droplets in the breath,’ said study author Dr Elisabetta Salvioni from Centro Cardiologico Monzino, IRCCS, Milan, Italy. 

‘Research suggests that wearing a mask may help prevent the spread of the disease, but there is no clear evidence on whether masks are safe to wear during vigorous exercise.’

In their research paper, which has been published in the European Respiratory Journal, the team stress that he use of protection masks ‘is essential to reduce contagions’.

However, they say there is a general belief that ‘their use is associated with shortness of breath during exercise and the need of a greater respiratory effort even at rest’. 

To learn more, the team worked with a group of healthy volunteers made up of six women and six men with an average age of 40.

Each person took part in three rounds of exercise tests – once while not wearing a face mask, and another while wearing a blue, surgical, single-use mask of the kind commonly worn in Britain that can be bought in bulk from supermarkets. 

For the third test, participants wore a ‘filtering face piece 2’ (FFP2) mask.

FFP2 masks are medical-grade and are much bulkier. 

They’re said to filter 95 per cent of large and small airborne particles and are widely used in hospitals. 

For one of the exercise tests, participants wore the standard blue single-use surgical mask (left) under the testing equipment (right)

For one of the exercise tests, participants wore the standard blue single-use surgical mask (left) under the testing equipment (right)

For one of the exercise tests, participants wore the standard blue single-use surgical mask (left) under the testing equipment (right)

For another test, participants wore FFP2 (left) under the testing equipment (right). The white FFP2 masks are also single-use but are believed to offer better protection than a surgical mask

For another test, participants wore FFP2 (left) under the testing equipment (right). The white FFP2 masks are also single-use but are believed to offer better protection than a surgical mask

For another test, participants wore FFP2 (left) under the testing equipment (right). The white FFP2 masks are also single-use but are believed to offer better protection than a surgical mask

WHAT ARE FFP2 MASKS? 

FFP2 masks are white, single use masks believed to offer slightly better protection than a surgical mask. 

FFP2 is recommended by the World Health Organisation and is the equivalent to the US’s N95 mask 

FFP2 masks are designed to fit closer to the face than other disposable face masks.

They’re not shaped to your face but are simply held in place by the elastic earloop.   

<!—->

Advertisement

While the volunteers used an exercise bike, the researchers measured their breathing, heart rate, blood pressure and the levels of oxygen in their blood.

Results of the tests showed that wearing a face mask had a small effect on the volunteers. 

For example, there was an average reduction of around 10 per cent in their ability to perform aerobic exercise according to their ‘peak VO2’ – their highest possible oxygen uptake.

According to the study authors, this reduction was probably because it was slightly harder for the volunteers to breathe in and out through the masks.

‘This reduction is modest and, crucially, it does not suggest a risk to healthy people doing exercise in a face mask, even when they are working to their highest capacity,’ said Dr Mapelli. 

‘While we wait for more people to be vaccinated against Covid-19, this finding could have practical implications in daily life, for example potentially making it safer to open indoor gyms.

‘However, we should not assume that the same is true for people with a heart or lung condition. 

‘We need to do more research to investigate this question.’

The team are now studying the impact of wearing a face mask while carrying out daily activities, such as climbing the stairs or doing housework, in both healthy people and those with heart and lung conditions.  

Experiments carried out using exercise bike. Researchers carried out detailed testing on breathing, heart activity and exercise performance in a group of 12 people while they were using the exercise bike with and without a mask

Experiments carried out using exercise bike. Researchers carried out detailed testing on breathing, heart activity and exercise performance in a group of 12 people while they were using the exercise bike with and without a mask

Experiments carried out using exercise bike. Researchers carried out detailed testing on breathing, heart activity and exercise performance in a group of 12 people while they were using the exercise bike with and without a mask

Despite the wide-scale rollout of the Covid-19 vaccine and the upcoming relaxation of lockdown measures, people will still have to wear their mask.  

In the UK, chief scientific adviser, Sir Patrick Vallance, said last month that face masks may still be required next winter, even if all adults in the UK have been vaccinated against Covid-19.

The government will keep a set of Covid measures after the country comes out of lockdown on June 21, which could include wearing masks in public.

Professor Graham Medley, a SAGE adviser and infectious disease expert at London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, also said masks may still be used in five years from now out of habit. 

In a document discussing life after Covid, SAGE said keeping some social distancing measures were ‘almost certain to save many lives and minimise the threat to hospital capacity’. 

Getting a coronavirus vaccine won't necessarily mean that you can stop wearing a face mask

Getting a coronavirus vaccine won't necessarily mean that you can stop wearing a face mask

Getting a coronavirus vaccine won’t necessarily mean that you can stop wearing a face mask 

Children are not legally required to wear face masks when they go back to school today and should not be sent home if they refuse to wear one, UK government officials previously stressed. 

Face coverings were first made mandatory for public transport in June 2020 and later for shops and other indoor spaces, after heated debates about whether they actually slow the spread of the virus. 

People wear face masks to protect others from the viral droplets that they might be emitting, rather than to protect themselves.

Results of one large Danish study from last year suggested face masks may only offer the wearer limited protection against Covid-19.

The authors found there was no statistically significant difference in the number of people who contacted the virus in a group wearing masks in public compared to a group that did not do so.  

In January, US researchers found wearing face masks triples the chance of keeping the coronavirus R rate below 1.

YOU WILL STILL HAVE TO WEAR A MASK AFTER GETTING A COVID VACCINE 

Getting a coronavirus vaccine won’t mean that you can stop wearing masks. 

When asked whether people would have to keep wearing masks after vaccination, Dr Anthony Fauci said: ‘Absolutely,’ in a Harvard University forum interview.  

‘There’s no doubt we should not say that vaccines are a replacement or public health measures.’ 

So far, vaccine makers like Pfizer and Moderna haven’t proven that their shots prevent people who are infected with coronavirus from spreading it. 

In fact, their clinical trials have not even proven the vaccines prevent people from catching coronavirus.  

We only know that vaccines keep most people from getting sick. 

Pfizer’s vaccine is 95 percent effective at keeping people from getting COVID-19 symptoms and testing positive for the virus. 

It’s about 100 percent effective at preventing people from getting severely ill from coronavirus, according to the clinical trial. 

But Pfizer did not look at whether or not the shot stops people from catching or spreading the virus. 

Its CEO has admitted as much in recent interviews. 

‘I think that’s something that needs to be examined. We’re not certain about that right now,’ said Albert Bourla, when asked by Dateline’s Lester Holt about whether the shot would prevent transmission.  

Pfizer researchers monitored whether people developed possible side effects from the shot or symptoms of coronavirus. 

If someone developed symptoms, they were tested for COVID-19.  

Pfizer did not test participants who didn’t have symptoms. Neither did Moderna.

In the end, 162 people in Pfizer’s trial who got the placebo shot developed coronavirus symptoms and tested positive, while just eight in the vaccinated group did. 

That’s a very strong signal that the vaccine keeps people from getting sick. It does not tell researchers whether people contracted the virus, but didn’t develop symptoms, or whether anyone passed on the infection.  

However, people get COVID-19 symptoms usually get sick because the virus has been able to multiply a lot inside their bodies. 

The more virus in your nose and throat, the more likely you are to pass it on.

So if vaccinated people don’t have enough virus to get sick, they probably don’t have enough of it to make other people sick. 

But Pfizer hasn’t even come close to proving that, so even vaccinated people will keep having to wear masks for months to come.  

<!—->

Advertisement

This post first appeared on Dailymail.co.uk

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You May Also Like

Marvel, crypto, Tucker Carlson: eight of 2023’s most spectacular downfalls

Experts on tech, politics and culture weigh in on the year the…

Babies created ‘WITHOUT sperm or eggs’ could be reality after man-made embryos grown in lab for 1st time

SCIENTISTS have managed to grow a synthetic embryo without sperm, an egg…

Facebook is launching NEW ‘News Feed’ with no posts from friends or family in January

FACEBOOK is adding a SECOND “News Feed” with zero posts from friends…

‘So cool!’ cheer Instagram users after finding new secret game hidden in DMs – an emoji trick unlocks it

INSTAGRAM has added a secret game into your Direct Messages – and…

Wearing a face mask during intense exercise is safe for healthy people, according to the results of a new study.

Italian researchers tested breathing ability, heart activity and exercise performance in a group of 12 healthy people while they were using an exercise bike with and without a mask on.

Although the experts found differences in some measurements between wearing a mask and not wearing a mask, there were no signs that wearing a mask during exercise presents any risk to health.  

Mask use during exercise causes ‘modest respiratory discomfort’, but for people of full health their use is safe even during maximal exercise, the authors claim.

It should be noted that they only tested healthy people, and anyone with respiratory problems should not combine exercise with wearing a face mask.  

Despite their conclusions, the World Health Organisation (WHO) stresses that no one, healthy or otherwise, should wear a mask when exercising. 

Wearing a protective face mask has only a modest effect on the ability of healthy people to do vigorous exercise, according to the study published today .The researchers say: 'exercise ventilatory limitation is far from being reached ... [mask use] is safe even during maximal exercise, with a slight reduction in performance'

Wearing a protective face mask has only a modest effect on the ability of healthy people to do vigorous exercise, according to the study published today .The researchers say: 'exercise ventilatory limitation is far from being reached ... [mask use] is safe even during maximal exercise, with a slight reduction in performance'

Wearing a protective face mask has only a modest effect on the ability of healthy people to do vigorous exercise, according to the study published today .The researchers say: ‘exercise ventilatory limitation is far from being reached … [mask use] is safe even during maximal exercise, with a slight reduction in performance’

Overall, the new research suggests that masks could be worn safely during intense exercise to reduce Covid-19 transmission, for example between people visiting an indoor gym.

Gyms can reopen in England from April 12 and in Scotland from April 26 as part of the gradual removal of lockdown measures.

Although gyms won’t make people wear masks when they’re working out, some chains may enforce mask-wearing when people are entering the gym and in communal areas like changing rooms. 

One author on the new study said it’s possible that breathing harder during exercise could facilitate transmission, especially indoors. 

WHAT’S WHO’S ADVICE?

The conclusions of this new study could form conclusions that go against the World Health Organisation (WHO), which stresses that people should NOT wear masks when exercising.

WHO says masks can reduce the ability to breathe comfortably and get wetter faster from sweat and exhaled respiratory droplets.

This, WHO claims, makes it more difficult to breathe and promotes the growth of microorganisms.  

<!—->

Advertisement

‘We know that the main route of transmission for coronavirus is via droplets in the breath,’ said study author Dr Elisabetta Salvioni from Centro Cardiologico Monzino, IRCCS, Milan, Italy. 

‘Research suggests that wearing a mask may help prevent the spread of the disease, but there is no clear evidence on whether masks are safe to wear during vigorous exercise.’

In their research paper, which has been published in the European Respiratory Journal, the team stress that he use of protection masks ‘is essential to reduce contagions’.

However, they say there is a general belief that ‘their use is associated with shortness of breath during exercise and the need of a greater respiratory effort even at rest’. 

To learn more, the team worked with a group of healthy volunteers made up of six women and six men with an average age of 40.

Each person took part in three rounds of exercise tests – once while not wearing a face mask, and another while wearing a blue, surgical, single-use mask of the kind commonly worn in Britain that can be bought in bulk from supermarkets. 

For the third test, participants wore a ‘filtering face piece 2’ (FFP2) mask.

FFP2 masks are medical-grade and are much bulkier. 

They’re said to filter 95 per cent of large and small airborne particles and are widely used in hospitals. 

For one of the exercise tests, participants wore the standard blue single-use surgical mask (left) under the testing equipment (right)

For one of the exercise tests, participants wore the standard blue single-use surgical mask (left) under the testing equipment (right)

For one of the exercise tests, participants wore the standard blue single-use surgical mask (left) under the testing equipment (right)

For another test, participants wore FFP2 (left) under the testing equipment (right). The white FFP2 masks are also single-use but are believed to offer better protection than a surgical mask

For another test, participants wore FFP2 (left) under the testing equipment (right). The white FFP2 masks are also single-use but are believed to offer better protection than a surgical mask

For another test, participants wore FFP2 (left) under the testing equipment (right). The white FFP2 masks are also single-use but are believed to offer better protection than a surgical mask

WHAT ARE FFP2 MASKS? 

FFP2 masks are white, single use masks believed to offer slightly better protection than a surgical mask. 

FFP2 is recommended by the World Health Organisation and is the equivalent to the US’s N95 mask 

FFP2 masks are designed to fit closer to the face than other disposable face masks.

They’re not shaped to your face but are simply held in place by the elastic earloop.   

<!—->

Advertisement

While the volunteers used an exercise bike, the researchers measured their breathing, heart rate, blood pressure and the levels of oxygen in their blood.

Results of the tests showed that wearing a face mask had a small effect on the volunteers. 

For example, there was an average reduction of around 10 per cent in their ability to perform aerobic exercise according to their ‘peak VO2’ – their highest possible oxygen uptake.

According to the study authors, this reduction was probably because it was slightly harder for the volunteers to breathe in and out through the masks.

‘This reduction is modest and, crucially, it does not suggest a risk to healthy people doing exercise in a face mask, even when they are working to their highest capacity,’ said Dr Mapelli. 

‘While we wait for more people to be vaccinated against Covid-19, this finding could have practical implications in daily life, for example potentially making it safer to open indoor gyms.

‘However, we should not assume that the same is true for people with a heart or lung condition. 

‘We need to do more research to investigate this question.’

The team are now studying the impact of wearing a face mask while carrying out daily activities, such as climbing the stairs or doing housework, in both healthy people and those with heart and lung conditions.  

Experiments carried out using exercise bike. Researchers carried out detailed testing on breathing, heart activity and exercise performance in a group of 12 people while they were using the exercise bike with and without a mask

Experiments carried out using exercise bike. Researchers carried out detailed testing on breathing, heart activity and exercise performance in a group of 12 people while they were using the exercise bike with and without a mask

Experiments carried out using exercise bike. Researchers carried out detailed testing on breathing, heart activity and exercise performance in a group of 12 people while they were using the exercise bike with and without a mask

Despite the wide-scale rollout of the Covid-19 vaccine and the upcoming relaxation of lockdown measures, people will still have to wear their mask.  

In the UK, chief scientific adviser, Sir Patrick Vallance, said last month that face masks may still be required next winter, even if all adults in the UK have been vaccinated against Covid-19.

The government will keep a set of Covid measures after the country comes out of lockdown on June 21, which could include wearing masks in public.

Professor Graham Medley, a SAGE adviser and infectious disease expert at London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, also said masks may still be used in five years from now out of habit. 

In a document discussing life after Covid, SAGE said keeping some social distancing measures were ‘almost certain to save many lives and minimise the threat to hospital capacity’. 

Getting a coronavirus vaccine won't necessarily mean that you can stop wearing a face mask

Getting a coronavirus vaccine won't necessarily mean that you can stop wearing a face mask

Getting a coronavirus vaccine won’t necessarily mean that you can stop wearing a face mask 

Children are not legally required to wear face masks when they go back to school today and should not be sent home if they refuse to wear one, UK government officials previously stressed. 

Face coverings were first made mandatory for public transport in June 2020 and later for shops and other indoor spaces, after heated debates about whether they actually slow the spread of the virus. 

People wear face masks to protect others from the viral droplets that they might be emitting, rather than to protect themselves.

Results of one large Danish study from last year suggested face masks may only offer the wearer limited protection against Covid-19.

The authors found there was no statistically significant difference in the number of people who contacted the virus in a group wearing masks in public compared to a group that did not do so.  

In January, US researchers found wearing face masks triples the chance of keeping the coronavirus R rate below 1.

YOU WILL STILL HAVE TO WEAR A MASK AFTER GETTING A COVID VACCINE 

Getting a coronavirus vaccine won’t mean that you can stop wearing masks. 

When asked whether people would have to keep wearing masks after vaccination, Dr Anthony Fauci said: ‘Absolutely,’ in a Harvard University forum interview.  

‘There’s no doubt we should not say that vaccines are a replacement or public health measures.’ 

So far, vaccine makers like Pfizer and Moderna haven’t proven that their shots prevent people who are infected with coronavirus from spreading it. 

In fact, their clinical trials have not even proven the vaccines prevent people from catching coronavirus.  

We only know that vaccines keep most people from getting sick. 

Pfizer’s vaccine is 95 percent effective at keeping people from getting COVID-19 symptoms and testing positive for the virus. 

It’s about 100 percent effective at preventing people from getting severely ill from coronavirus, according to the clinical trial. 

But Pfizer did not look at whether or not the shot stops people from catching or spreading the virus. 

Its CEO has admitted as much in recent interviews. 

‘I think that’s something that needs to be examined. We’re not certain about that right now,’ said Albert Bourla, when asked by Dateline’s Lester Holt about whether the shot would prevent transmission.  

Pfizer researchers monitored whether people developed possible side effects from the shot or symptoms of coronavirus. 

If someone developed symptoms, they were tested for COVID-19.  

Pfizer did not test participants who didn’t have symptoms. Neither did Moderna.

In the end, 162 people in Pfizer’s trial who got the placebo shot developed coronavirus symptoms and tested positive, while just eight in the vaccinated group did. 

That’s a very strong signal that the vaccine keeps people from getting sick. It does not tell researchers whether people contracted the virus, but didn’t develop symptoms, or whether anyone passed on the infection.  

However, people get COVID-19 symptoms usually get sick because the virus has been able to multiply a lot inside their bodies. 

The more virus in your nose and throat, the more likely you are to pass it on.

So if vaccinated people don’t have enough virus to get sick, they probably don’t have enough of it to make other people sick. 

But Pfizer hasn’t even come close to proving that, so even vaccinated people will keep having to wear masks for months to come.  

<!—->

Advertisement

This post first appeared on Dailymail.co.uk

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You May Also Like

TCL Q7 Review: The Best Affordable TV

It’s a newer brand, but TCL has already cemented its place on…

NASA’s Orion spacecraft snaps a stunning photo of the moon during its lunar fly-by 

NASA‘s Orion spacecraft took a breathtaking image of the moon as it…

Transport Apps Promised to Eliminate Friction. But at What Cost?

In the vision of the “frictionless” city that is held by many…

Bitcoin price latest updates – Cryptocurrency on rise again as Ethereum and Dogecoin lose steam despite Elon Musk on SNL

ETHEREUM’S incredible price surge has made its 27-year-old founder a BILLIONAIRE. Vitalik…