Physiotherapist Anthony Cusack on why he and his colleagues have voted for industrial action. Plus letters from David A Richards, Brian Chatterton and Dr Allan Dodds

Gaby Hinsliff’s article on NHS pay (Sunak is the ‘too little, too late’ PM. That’s why he’s failing over the NHS and this wave of strikes, 22 December) raises some excellent points about the need to reclaim “reform”. I work as an inpatient physiotherapist in the NHS and we have also recently voted for industrial action. The main reason that is mooted for this, and for supporting our nursing colleagues, is that we are voting for the future of our professions. The pay freezes in the name of austerity have inevitably created an almost unbridgeable inflationary gap, hence the Royal College of Nursing’s request for a 19% pay rise.

The pay freezes were not the only issue. Readjusted safe staffing numbers created ratios of one nurse to eight patients in acute care, and one to 12 in rehab. These levels are designed to be the minimum, but have become the target. These levels are not guaranteed by law in England. Add in staff vacancies and sickness, and you start to get to very low numbers. The sad fact is that as senior nurses filled the gaps on strike days, we saw better staffing levels than we did on the days either side. Evidence shows that low staffing numbers result in patients being less mobile, increasing deconditioning. These pressures reduce the likelihood of adequate communication and increase tension between staff, patients and relatives.

To provide the much-needed reform from passive entitlement to “care” towards more active engagement in prevention and recovery, we first need the numbers and future recruits. This is only possible through fair recognition – a pay rise.
Anthony Cusack
Cardiff

• Recently a fellow nurse and I published an account in the International Journal of Nursing Studies of the failings in nursing care we received while in hospital. We were castigated online by senior nurses for our disloyalty and ostracised for our temerity in describing these lived experiences. Gaby Hinsliff is right: laud the founding principles of the NHS, but challenge the archaic managerial, professional and clinical vested interests that prevent real reform.
David A Richards
Emeritus professor of mental health services research, University of Exeter

Continue reading…

You May Also Like

Lord’s ready for right royal occasion as Ben Stokes begins England reign | Ali Martin

Ben Stokes starts his Test captaincy at the home of cricket against…

Pacific trade deal is more useful to Joe Biden than it is to the UK’s economy

Hailed by Tory MPs as a Brexit benefit, CPTPP membership actually turns…

Michael Morpurgo denies ‘censoring’ Merchant of Venice in children’s book

War Horse author says his Tales from Shakespeare was only ever going…

Prince Harry loses bid to challenge UK government over security

Harry was seeking judicial review over whether to allow him to pay…