Attorney general’s attempt to end climate protesters’ use of consent defence is slippery slope, says KC

A UK government attempt to remove one of the last remaining defences for climate protesters would be a slippery slope to the erosion of the constitutional right to trial by jury, the court of appeal was told on Wednesday.

The attorney general, Victoria Prentis KC, is arguing that one of the last available defences being used by environmental protesters should be removed. Prentis is making the appeal in the case of a defendant known as C, after a string of acquittals by juries of defendants for acts of criminal damage involving daubing paint on buildings.

Continue reading…

You May Also Like

Georgia Harrison: I didn’t realise how difficult revenge porn case would be

Reality TV star speaks about ordeal after ex-boyfriend Stephen Bear was jailed…

Urgent need for temporary concussion substitutes inexplicably ignored by Ifab | Barry Glendenning

Worrying cases of Denis Zakaria, Neco Williams and Alireza Beiranvand illustrate the…

The verdict on the Sewell report into racial disparity | Halima Begum and others

Did the government’s response to the Black Lives Matter protests measure up?…