The Government is coming under increasing pressure to introduce legislation that will ensure nationwide access to cash and banking services. Such legislation was promised more than a year ago but has been delayed for a number of reasons including the pandemic.
Some experts now fear that unless the Government acts soon, the country’s cash system could collapse within the next 12 to 24 months, leaving more than five million adults reliant on cash financially excluded. It would also be catastrophic for many small businesses that are still heavily dependent on cash sales.
Consumer group Which? says the Government should set out its plans in the Queen’s Speech early next month. ‘We’re at a critical moment,’ the organisation’s Gareth Shaw told The Mail on Sunday yesterday. ‘We need the Government to show us a roadmap that will safeguard consumers’ access to cash, at a time when ATMs and bank branches are closing at record levels. Its intervention cannot come soon enough.’
The end of the line?: Some experts now fear that unless the Government acts soon, the country’s cash system could collapse within the next 12 to 24 months
The latest data from Which? indicates that 50 bank branches per month have shut on average since the beginning of 2015 with NatWest Group axing nearly 1,100. Simultaneously, many free-to-use cash machines have been taken out of service – one in four since 2018.
In some deprived areas where cash usage is widespread, free-touse ATMs have been replaced with fee-charging machines, resulting in vulnerable people being ‘overcharged’ for accessing their cash.
Shaw, head of money at Which?, believes that any legislation should require the Financial Conduct Authority – the City’s regulator – to have overall responsibility for overseeing access to cash, including holding banks to account when they do not act in the best interests of consumers.
Without such regulatory oversight, he fears that the banks will simply keep encouraging more customers to jettison cash in favour of contactless payment and mobile banking. ‘Legislation is key, not piecemeal solutions,’ he said.
The plea by Which? for Government action follows in the wake of a key report on financial exclusion published yesterday by a House of Lords committee.
Among its many recommendations, the Liaison Committee calls for the Government to come up with a comprehensive financial inclusion strategy ‘that will ensure access to cash’ and ‘protect the public’. Like Which?, it believes legislation should be introduced – laws that would impose a statutory duty on the banks to provide customers with access to cash in communities where they close branches or ATMs.
Baroness Tyler of Enfield was chair of a previous House of Lords report into financial exclusion back in 2017 – work that formed the starting point for the latest suggestions.
Yesterday she told The Mail on Sunday: ‘Access to cash was a problem in 2017. But now, with the pandemic, more bank and ATM closures and many retailers going cashless, it’s a bigger issue than ever.’
She added: ‘The current regulatory framework governing access to cash and banking services is not strong enough. The Financial Conduct Authority should be empowered to be more on the front foot when banks leave communities behind.
‘Currently, the impression is that the banks pay lip service to customers’ needs. That has to stop, which means regulation and a more proactive approach from the regulator.’ Although she said it would be ‘fantastic’ to hear the promise of legislation in the Queen’s Speech next month, she accepts that there is a ‘fight for legislation time’ which could result in disappointment.
Yesterday’s House of Lords report also called for the Government to promote more aggressively the banking services of the Post Office.
When a last bank branch in a community is shut, the local post office is often the only place where customers can then deposit and withdraw cash. The committee argues for a ‘public information campaign’ explaining the services that post offices provide – a campaign that should be both ‘comprehensive’ and ‘national’. Baroness Tyler told The Mail on Sunday she was ‘delighted’ that new-style Post Office ‘banking hubs’ were also now being trialled as part of a ‘community access to cash pilots’ project funded by the banks via trade organisation UK Finance.
The pilots are being overseen by Natalie Ceeney, former boss of the Financial Ombudsman Service, who has done more than anyone in recent years to highlight the dangers posed by the rush to a cashless society. Three years ago, she published an ‘Access to Cash’ review calling for the Government and regulators to act in order to ensure cash remains a viable payment option.
Two of the eight pilots – in Rochford, Essex, and Cambuslang, South Lanarkshire – involve the testing of the banking hubs. Others are trialling different ways of making cash more accessible in communities – from simply installing a free-to-use cash machine in a community previously deprived of one, through to making cashback services more accessible (see below).
As well as offering banking services to personal and small business customers of all the big banks, the Post Office hubs allow people to meet a representative from their bank on a selected day. Feedback so far from Rochford indicates widespread support for the idea.
Although all the trials under the cash pilot project will only run for six months, Ceeney’s wish is that if the two Post Office banking hubs prove successful, they could pave the way for a nationwide rollout.
Some, she believes, could be located in the very branches that are due to shut in the coming months as all the major banks – such as HSBC, Santander and TSB – reduce their high street presence. ‘Such hubs would breathe life back into struggling communities,’ says Ceeney.
Baroness Tyler said: ‘I see these Post Office hubs as a really important part of fixing the access to cash problem.’
The Mail on Sunday has long campaigned for access to cash to be maintained. We have also been a longstanding supporter of shared bank branches – an idea first put forward by the Campaign for Community Banking Services in the late 1990s. Although trials were carried out, the banks quashed the idea.
Last week, we asked the Government to comment on when legislation on access to cash was likely. It failed to comment.