It’s a subject that has been highly debated for decades: does money really make you happy?

Now, scientists claim to have settled the debate, and it’s good news if your bank account isn’t bursting at the seams.

In a new study, experts surveyed almost 3,000 people from Indigenous and local communities around the world – 36 per cent of who did not have any cash income.

The surveys revealed that despite having very little money, many of these people reported high levels of life satisfaction.

‘The strong correlation frequently observed between income and life satisfaction is not universal and proves that wealth – as generated by industrialized economies – is not fundamentally required for humans to lead happy lives,’ said Victoria Reyes-Garcia, senior author of the study.

It's a subject that has been highly debated for decades: does money really make you happy? Now, scientists claim to have settled the debate – and it's good news if your bank account isn't bursting at the seams (stock image)

It's a subject that has been highly debated for decades: does money really make you happy? Now, scientists claim to have settled the debate – and it's good news if your bank account isn't bursting at the seams (stock image)

It’s a subject that has been highly debated for decades: does money really make you happy? Now, scientists claim to have settled the debate – and it’s good news if your bank account isn’t bursting at the seams (stock image)

Until now, economic growth has been widely regarded as a sure way of increasing the wellbeing of people in low-income countries.

In fact, global surveys in recent years have supported this strategy, by showing that people in high-income countries tend to be more satisfied with their lives than those in low-income countries.

However, in their new study, the researchers set out to challenge whether this link is universal.

The team surveyed 2,966 people from Indigenous and local communities around the world about their income and life satisfaction.

The results revealed that on a scale of 0 to 10, the average life satisfaction score was 6.8.

However, some of the societies had average scores of higher than 8 – levels usually seen in wealthy Scandinavian countries.

‘Surprisingly, many populations with very low monetary incomes report very high average levels of life satisfaction, with scores similar to those in wealthy countries,’ said Eric Galbraith, lead author of the study.

According to the researchers, the findings suggest that some societies can support very satisfactory lives for their members without needing high degrees of material wealth.

However, the team is still unsure why this is the case.

They highlight that previous research suggests that family and social support and relationships, spirituality, and connections to nature are among the important factors on which happiness is based.

‘But it is possible that the important factors differ significantly between societies or, conversely, that a small subset of factors dominate everywhere,’ Mr Galbraith added.

‘I would hope that, by learning more about what makes life satisfying in these diverse communities, it might help many others to lead more satisfying lives while addressing the sustainability crisis.’

WHAT IS UNIVERSAL BASIC INCOME AND HOW WOULD IT WORK?

Universal Basic Income (UBI) proposals are on the rise, with many backing the system as a possible solution for unemployment caused by the rise of machines equipped with artificial intelligence taking over the workforce.

The system would see governments paying every citizen of a country a base salary to cover costs including food and rent.

The guaranteed sum would be paid by the state to everyone, regardless of wealth or work status.

Dpending on the details of the UBI proposal, the funds could be added to existing benefits or put in place of them.

Left-wing supporters of the system say that it could lower proverty rates. For the right-leaners, it’s a route to a less bureaucratic wellfare system.

The program would likely be funded by an increase in income taxes across all income levels.

To pay every adult and child in the United States a yearly income of £8,045 ($10,000) per year, the government would likely have to cut most non-health social spending programs and raise the share of GDP collected in tax by ten per cent, according to the Economist.

Another suggestion is a negative interest rate, that would take a percentage of every citizen’s bank account each month.

A universal basic income in the United Kingdom that would give every adult and child £12,000 ($14,900) per year requires a negative interest rate of 2.5 percent per month, according to the Centre for Welfare Reform.

So, if a person were to have £5,000 ($6,600) in his or her bank account at the beginning of the month, by the end, £4,884 ($6,500) would be left because £116 ($153) would be taken by the government for a universal basic income pot.

Some have suggested a sliding scale of basic income, so the higher a person’s employment salary, the lower basic income check he or she would receive from the government.

The left-wing French presidential candidate Benoit Hamon, backed by the star economist Thomas Piketty, has also made the basic income part of his platform. 

Finland is the first European country to pay its unemployed citizens an unconditional sum.

The two-year pilot scheme, which started January 1, gives unemployed Finland citizens aged 25 to 58 a guaranteed sum of €560 (£490/$648) that replaces existing social benefits.

The funds will still be paid if they eventually find work.

In Marica, Brazil, a seaside town of about 150,000 people near Rio de Janeiro, the left-wing municipal government has spent the last year finding out universal basic salaries work.

In Marica – a surviving Workers’ Party bastion in increasingly right-leaning Brazil – the basic income idea fits in well with the leadership’s socialist fervor.

However, if Finland is handing out payments of about $590 (£450) a month – and only to a test group of unemployed people for now – the amount in Marica is a measly 10 reais, or about $3.20 (£2.40). The new mayor hopes to raise the amount to $32 (£24) in 2017.

Only the town’s 14,000 poorest families are currently being given the income, which is denominated in Mumbucas, a virtual currency created to pay welfare under Quaqua three years ago.

The 10 reais is added to the 85 reais ($27/ £20) monthly welfare check for families whose income doesn’t top three times the minimum wage. The extra money is also given to poorer people aged between 14 and 29 and pregnant women already receiving other benefits.

There’s another limitation: only 131 local businesses – less than 10 percent of the total – accept payment in Mumbucas, the mayor’s office says.

The currency, which physically exists only on specially issued red magnetic cards, is unpopular with business owners because they must wait more than a month after purchases are completed for the government to convert payments into reals.

This post first appeared on Dailymail.co.uk

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You May Also Like

Amazon offers free upgrade to millions of Fire TV owners that makes your home look better with genius ‘Titan’ feature

AMAZON is offering a free upgrade to millions of Fire TV owners…

Let People Collect Sperm From the Dead

Critics argue that even if someone wanted to have biological children—for instance,…

Therabody Smart Goggles Review: Heat, Vibrations, and Massage

The modern world has ruined my brain. I’m in constant need of…

TikTok Is Banned on Phones of U.S. House Members and Staff

Politics Action follows new law banning the app in executive branch agencies…