Loch Ness Monster might NOT have been a giant eel after all, study claims

THE theory that the Loch Ness Monster was simply a giant eel might be false, a new study has claimed.

The Scottish folklore tale says a “water beast” once roamed the freshwater lake in the Highlands, as far back as the sixth century.

A recreation of the famous "surgeon's photograph" that supposedly pictured Nessie for the first time — A recreation of the famous “surgeon’s photograph” that supposedly pictured Nessie for the first time

The existence of a giant salamander-or whale-like creature in the loch was wildly popularised in the 1930s.

This was helped by the so-called “surgeon’s photograph”, a grainy, black and white image of what looks like a Brachiosaurus dinosaur wading through water – supposedly the first image of the beast.

The image is now known to have been a hoax.

But people have clung to the ancient belief that there really was a watery dino lurking within the quiet Loch Ness, in the Scottish Highlands.

Nasa uncover clue on one of Saturn’s moons 'essential' to supporting alien life

New species of meat-eating dinosaur as big as school bus unearthed in Spain

Although the scientific community has largely explained alleged sightings of Nessie as hoaxing and wishful thinking, some seem to think the creature was an exceptionally large eel.

But in a study published in JMIRx Bio, scientist Floe Foxon said previous estimates of the monster’s size cast doubt onto the eel theory.

The animal is thought to have been more than one-metre in length, but the chances of encountering an eel of the same size in Loch Ness are approximately one in 50,000.

While the probability of finding even larger eels, is “virtually zero”, according to the new research.