The regulatory fast-tracking of the Covid vaccine in Britain by MHRA has led some to question its methods

The Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Authority (MHRA) in the UK has not had a round of applause from anyone other than the UK’s politicians and the vaccine companies. It gave temporary authorisation to the Pfizer/BioNTech vaccine on Wednesday and within hours, the European Medicines Agency (EMA) put out a stiff statement implying more work was needed than the UK regulator had done. Its own decision could come as late as 29 December. It may well have been needled by the crowing of the health secretary, Matt Hancock, who claimed the fast approval as a Brexit triumph. He had to backtrack. The MHRA’s chief executive, June Raine, pointed out that the agency had simply taken advantage of a provision that any country in Europe could use, to fast-track approval in a pandemic.

Continue reading…

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You May Also Like

UN to investigate prison attack that killed dozens of Ukrainian prisoners of war

Next challenge is to get Russia and Ukraine to agree on terms…

Lockdown strengthened their love, but would Jonathan and Kit survive life’s ‘boring bits’?

Back in spring, Jonathan Lovett and Kit Yunes had only just become…

UK imposes sanctions on seven Russians over Navalny poisoning

FCDO says the individuals, said to be FSB members, will be subject…

The scandal that wasn’t: Republicans deflated as nation shrugs at Hunter Biden revelations

Trump and his allies foresaw a ticking timebomb centred on the president’s…