High court finds that government insistence that applicants meet ‘good character’ requirement was unlawful

The Home Office’s handling of some Windrush citizenship applications has been irrational and unlawful, the high court has ruled in a judgment that will prevent the department from refusing citizenship to Windrush-generation applicants due to minor, historical convictions.

The court was ruling on the case of Hubert Howard, who was repeatedly denied British citizenship over the course of a decade, despite having lived in the UK since he arrived from Jamaica at the age of three in 1960.

Continue reading…

You May Also Like

Britons in France could lose driving licences due to post-Brexit impasse

Thousands face not having a valid permit after lack of deal between…

Australia election: conservative government voted out after nearly a decade

Anthony Albanese’s Labor party defeats the ruling Coalition, but may lack the…

How fearless Alice de Rothschild put her stamp on a grand country retreat

Legacy of 19th-century socialite known for ‘Miss Alice’s rules’ in focus at…

‘The heart of darkness’: neighbors shun Brazil over Covid response

Latin American countries scramble to protect themselves from a country where nearly…