Embattled cruise line Carnival has been hit by a shareholder revolt over its boss’s £11.4m pay packet. 

In an embarrassment for the FTSE 250 firm, 36 per cent voted against its pay report.

It will now join the executive pay ‘list of shame’, overseen by the Investment Association trade body. Firms are named if at least 20 per cent of shareholders oppose bosses’ earnings. 

Sailing into a storm: Carnival gave chief executive Arnold Donald a potential package of more than £11.4m – including a £4.6m bonus

Sailing into a storm: Carnival gave chief executive Arnold Donald a potential package of more than £11.4m – including a £4.6m bonus

Carnival gave chief executive Arnold Donald, 68, a potential package of more than £11.4m – including a £4.6m bonus, despite its use of the taxpayer-funded furlough scheme, not paying dividends and pushing through redundancies during the pandemic. 

Institutional Shareholder Services, an adviser to pension funds, said it had ‘material concerns’ about his package, adding: ‘The annual bonus appears to have been entirely discretionary, paid out at maximum despite poor shareholder returns, and 2021 equity grants to executives lacked performance criteria.’ 

One of the biggest shareholders, Legal & General Investment Management, with £1.4trillion in assets, voted against the pay policy. 

It also criticised Carnival for removing links between pay and financial performance. The cruise giant said Covid meant it was not possible to set financial targets, claiming it was ‘impractical to develop financial operating performance goals’ in connection with the annual bonus. 

Shareholder revolt: Arnold Donald

Shareholder revolt: Arnold Donald

Carnival felt the heat when cruises were stopped in 2020 at the start of the pandemic, and 3,500 passengers were trapped on its Grand Princess liner due to an outbreak. 

It has made a loss during the pandemic – with red ink of £7.8billion in 2020 and £7.3billion last year. Shares are down by nearly 20 per cent over the past year, at £13.51. 

The firm said its ‘required filings… do not represent what our CEO received in any given year since we operate in a pay-for-performance model where most of his CEO pay is at risk’. 

It said in the results for its annual meeting that ‘the board of directors are committed to open and transparent dialogue with shareholders and will continue to engage with them, in particular to understand the views and concerns of those shareholders who voted against these resolutions’.

This post first appeared on Dailymail.co.uk

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You May Also Like

HAMISH MCRAE: Bumpy months ahead for shares

It is a grumpy, ill-tempered autumn, and it is going to get…

As Britons embrace the digital age what will become of those left behind?

Britons are increasingly using online banking, money apps and contactless cards, a…

Financial Conduct Authority probes traders for Brexit vote ‘spoofing’

Britain’s financial watchdog is investigating three traders at an unnamed bank for…

Ordinary two-bed terraced home holds magical secret – wait until you see inside

A HOGWARTS superfan dug into her cash Pott to create her own…