John Hart finds the return of New Labour ideology a depressing prospect, while Keith Flett questions the purpose of the party under Keir Starmer’s leadership

Jonathan Freedland attributes New Labour’s electoral victory in 1997 to “doing whatever it took to win” (Tony Blair had it easy. Keir Starmer is in a much deeper hole, 15 October). But there is no point in gaining power if you sell your soul to the devil. The BBC’s Blair & Brown: The New Labour Revolution, which he refers to, also attributes Labour’s success to vanquishing or at least suppressing the left of the party, thus bringing Labour into the electable mainstream.

This comfortable analysis forgets that no political party in this country has won an election in the past 30 years without the backing of News International. It is this and not the showmanship of Boris Johnson that explains why, despite all the U-turns and bungling of the Covid response, the Conservatives remain ahead in the polls.

Continue reading…

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You May Also Like

Rupert Murdoch calls off proposed Fox-News Corp merger

Billionaire mogul says in letter that proposal to reunite companies he split…

Covid has wiped out years of progress on life expectancy, finds study

Pandemic behind biggest fall in life expectancy in western Europe since second…

Nick Cave on love, art and the loss of his sons: ‘It’s against nature to bury your children’

In the past nine years, the musician and artist has lost two…

Ashes 2021-22: Australia v England first Test, day one – live!

First ball at the Gabba in Brisbane at 11am AEDT, 12am GMT…