Britain could have regulated the City and attracted green investment from inside the EU

Giving up membership of the EU is changing the UK economy. But not in the way the headlines suggest. Last week there was much crowing that Brexit Britain had secured a £1bn electric vehicle hub in Sunderland, where Nissan will produce a new all-electric car model and its partner Envision will build a huge battery factory. This was good news. But there was less focus on the fact that the units built will be tailored to rules set by Brussels.

Ministers are coy about what was paid to keep the Japanese car giant here. States often dangle economic carrots to attract investment. The UK would have done so had we stayed in the EU. Instead, with Britain outside the bloc, Nissan had the upper hand in negotiations. If the plant had gone somewhere else, it would have been a clear signal that Britain was a less attractive destination outside the EU than it was within. Without the investment, ministers could have credibly been accused of betraying “red wall” voters.

Continue reading…

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You May Also Like

Covid probably passed to humans from bats via other animal, finds WHO report

Much-delayed report from team that visited Wuhan all but rules out lab…

Trendy block of flats with apartments to rent for £575 a month – but can YOU see why it’s being mocked?

STUNNED home hunters have ridiculed a trendy block of flats for looking…

John Lewis needs Xmas miracle after racking up near £100m half-year loss

John Lewis warned staff there may be no annual bonus this year…

The Body Shop set to appoint administrators; UK hit by ‘significant long-run cost of Brexit’ – business live

Goldman Sachs’s ‘Doppelgänger’ analysis suggests UK real GDP has unperformed similar nations…