The requirement to present photo ID at polling stations reinforces confidence in our elections, says Robert Frazer, but Maureen McLaughlin worries about those left without a vote. Plus letters from Nigel Evans and Peter Bottomley

I cannot agree with Andy Beckett’s condemnation of voter ID (After this week’s squalid experiment, see voter ID for what it is: a Tory scam to steal elections, 3 May). The basic principle of voter ID is not objectionable: we all agree that Europe has much more sophisticated political systems and mature political cultures than Britain, and voter ID laws are commonplace across Europe. France, Germany, Finland, the Netherlands, Sweden and Italy all require their electors to present identification when voting. Are all these EU members also enemies of democracy?

Furthermore, it is difficult to square claims that the progressive vote was suppressed with the fact that the Conservative vote collapsed and Labour – and leftwing politics in general – were hugely successful last week. Clearly, the hypothetical fears that the progressive vote would be curtailed were simply not borne out in reality.

Continue reading…

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You May Also Like

Seven in 10 NHS trusts in England failing to hit cancer referrals target

Charity criticises delays after rise in trusts missing two-week target in suspected…

Extra $6bn in US arms for Ukraine after ‘accounting error’

Previous error doubles in size but will mean a boost in weapons,…

The poison umbrella: film sheds new light on infamous cold war killing

Documentary questions why prime suspect was never arrested over 1978 murder in…