A view of the iconic Facebook ‘Like’ thumbs-up sign at the entrance to Facebook Headquarters in Menlo Park, Calif., in May.

Photo: john g. mabanglo/EPA/Shutterstock

Dueling antitrust lawsuits against Facebook Inc. highlighted the social-media giant’s acquisitions of photo-sharing platform Instagram and messaging service WhatsApp.

But the allegations of anticompetitive practices included another through-line with potentially far-reaching implications for enterprise technology companies: data sharing.

The suits filed Wednesday by the Federal Trade Commission and 46 state attorneys general argue Facebook leveraged its trove of user information both to entice third-party developers onto the platform and to bend them toward its will.

The mechanism for such data sharing—application programming interfaces—is a crucial tool for software engineers and a key element of digital industries such as advertising and financial technology.

New York Attorney General Letitia James on Wednesday joined 45 other state attorneys general and the Federal Trade Commission in suing Facebook Inc., alleging that it illegally stifled competition.

Photo: Kathy Willens/Associated Press

“[The case] could set precedents for any platform that creates a service, shares data through an API and has conditions on that data sharing,” said Sinan Aral, director of the MIT Initiative on the Digital Economy. An API is a set of functions that enables two applications to communicate.

The lawsuits come as the coronavirus pandemic has accelerated companies’ use of data analytics to better understand their customers and transform their businesses.

State and federal officials’ focus on APIs, meanwhile, illustrates how regulators increasingly are probing the data sharing and processing that drive such changes.

Many tech platforms use APIs, giving third-party developers access to their users in exchange for the improved distribution that can come with closely integrated apps.

FTC officials allege Facebook encouraged developers to make games, e-marketing tools and other apps by hooking into the platform through various APIs. The dynamic gave Facebook “immense power over apps’ developmental trajectories, competitive decision making and investment strategies,” FTC officials wrote.

The lawsuits claim that Facebook eventually curtailed or denied access to such partners, which numbered in the millions, as they began to export user data to Facebook competitors or challenge Facebook for user engagement.

The policy change, the attorneys general wrote, “told developers in no uncertain terms that valuable access to Facebook’s APIs was conditioned on their staying away from Facebook’s turf.”

The looming legal battle will shed light on whether the access restrictions are emblematic of a structural problem within platforms such as Facebook, said Robert Atkinson, president of the Information Technology and Innovation Foundation, a Washington think tank.

“At one level, it’s their data and it’s their interface,” he said. “At another level, when you’re that big, there are some limits on what you can do to negatively affect a competitor.”

How that argument plays out could affect the way established companies and upstart challengers share information in other industries. Mr. Atkinson pointed to the financial sector, where big banks and fintech startups have similarly sparred over API access and data security.

New York State Attorney General Letitia James outlined a sweeping antitrust suit against Facebook by the Federal Trade Commission and a bipartisan group of 46 state attorneys general, targeting the company’s tactics against competitors. Photo: Saul Loeb/AFP via Getty Images

Facebook previously cited user privacy in limiting developers’ access to user data. In a blog post addressing the lawsuits, Facebook Vice President and General Counsel Jennifer Newstead said such restrictions are standard in the tech industry.

“Facebook told these apps that they could not use Facebook’s platform to essentially replicate Facebook,” she wrote. “Significantly, Facebook did nothing to prevent any apps from offering their services on their own sites or anywhere else on the internet.”

The antitrust actions, which could take years to play out in court, may also have downstream effects on deal making amid an economic shake-up, analysts say.

Tech consolidation has accelerated over the past six months, as larger, well-capitalized companies bought competitors, taking advantage of low interest rates and the economic uncertainty sparked by the pandemic, according to a report Thursday by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP.

Greater regulatory scrutiny in the year ahead could slow the pace of high-end deal making, the report said, citing broad policy proposals by President-elect Joe Biden to clampdown on large tech firms and raise the corporate tax rate.

Mr. Atkinson, of the Information Technology and Innovation Foundation, said retroactive policing of mergers could chill future acquisitions. Federal regulators previously approved Facebook’s deals for Instagram and WhatsApp.

“You could see interventions in more areas like cloud computing, maybe certain types of cloud services,” he said. “Why stop at consumer-facing applications?”

Write to David Uberti at [email protected]

Copyright ©2020 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 87990cbe856818d5eddac44c7b1cdeb8

This post first appeared on wsj.com

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You May Also Like

Man with rifle shot by troopers outside Missouri highway patrol building

A man with an assault-style rifle was shot and wounded by officers…

Rittenhouse trial juror dismissed for telling joke about Jacob Blake shooting

A juror in the trial of Kyle Rittenhouse was dismissed early Thursday…

Texas Democrats to spotlight national voting rights with week of events

The Texas Democrats who fled the state last week to block voting…

Little League World Series officials say there was ‘no ill intent’ after team sticks ‘cotton’ on Black player’s head

Little League World Series officials have said there was no “ill-intent” after…