FORT PIERCE, Fla. — The Mar-a-Lago property manager charged in a new indictment alongside Donald Trump over the handling of classified government documents had to once again delay his arraignment in a Florida court on Thursday after he was still unable to secure a local lawyer.

Carlos De Oliveira, 56, is accused of conspiring with Trump and Walt Nauta, a personal aide for the former president, to thwart federal investigators’ efforts to retrieve sensitive files from Trump after he left office. De Oliveira was named a co-conspirator alongside Trump and Nauta in special counsel Jack Smith’s updated indictment last month. 

A Florida attorney, Donald Morrell, who sat by De Oliveira in the courtroom had not yet filed a notice of appearance in the case. He told the judge that he hoped to do so by tomorrow afternoon after ironing out some details. It is “close to being handled,” he said.

Carlos De Oliveira, property manager of former President Donald Trump's Mar-a-Lago estate, arrives at the Alto Lee Adams Sr. U.S. Courthouse in Fort Pierce, Fla., on Aug. 10, 2023.
Carlos De Oliveira, property manager of former President Donald Trump’s Mar-a-Lago estate, arrives Thursday at the courthouse.Eva Maire Uzcategui / AFP – Getty Images

De Oliveira arrived at the courthouse at about 9:45 a.m. ET on Thursday. Nauta arrived separately.

According to the indictment, De Oliveira told an employee at Trump’s Palm Beach club that “the boss” wanted video surveillance footage deleted, after federal investigators requested the recordings from the former president’s attorneys. He is also accused of making false statements to the government, saying that he “never saw anything” when asked about his involvement in moving boxes containing the classified files. 

Appearing before a judge for the first time last week, De Oliveira was unable to enter his plea because he had not secured a Florida-based attorney. Hours before he was newly set to be arraigned, it was still not known whether he had retained local counsel.

Trump pleaded not guilty to the new charges and waived his notice of appearance at the arraignment in a court filing last week. The plea was entered by a lawyer. Nauta w set to be arraigned alongside De Oliveira on the new charges in Fort Pierce, about an hour from Palm Beach.

Questions about who is set to represent Trump and his codefendants have drawn close scrutiny since the first charges were announced in June with routine processes drawn out at several junctures. Nauta’s not guilty plea was twice delayed after he was unable to secure a Florida attorney.

Waltine Nauta, personal aide to former President Donald Trump, arrives at the Alto Lee Adams Sr. U.S. Courthouse in Fort Pierce, Fla., on Aug. 10, 2023.
Walt Nauta, personal aide to former President Donald Trump, arrives at the courthouse Thursday.Chandan Khanna / AFP – Getty Images

Mark Schnapp, a criminal defense attorney and former federal prosecutor in Florida’s Southern District, said De Oliveira should have a lawyer by the hearing.

“Candidly, there’s no reason he can’t find a lawyer,” Schnapp said. 

The former president’s lawyers have also cited the threat of further legal jeopardy to push for a later trial date, and Trump has called for the case to be tried after the 2024 election, since he is currently running for president. 

The judge in Thursday’s hearing could also address questions about the handling of classified information and potential conflicts of interest for lawyers involved in the case. Trump’s political fundraising group has also paid attorneys representing his aides and employees.

In a court filing this week, the federal judge overseeing the case responded to a request by the government for a hearing over this issue by asking the special counsel about whether prosecutors continue to investigate the former president before a different grand jury. 

Schnapp said the government’s motion, which referenced charges developed by a grand jury in Washington, D.C., “opened the door” to the judge’s inquiry and offered a potential opening for the defense to dismiss the obstruction counts. 

“In an extreme situation, this could be the basis for a motion to dismiss the superseding indictment or the new counts,” said Schnapp, a former chief of the criminal division at the U.S. attorney’s office in Miami. Still, he said the motion was unlikely to succeed.

Source: | This article originally belongs to Nbcnews.com

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You May Also Like

Artist refuses to open Israeli pavilion at Venice Biennale until Gaza cease-fire

“It’s a very courageous decision,” Pedrosa told The Associated Press. “I think…

N.Y. Gov. Kathy Hochul lifts statewide mask mandate at center of legal battle

New York Gov. Kathy Hochul lifted a statewide mask mandate Wednesday amid…

Lucid, Long Before SPAC, Promised to Build Saudi Auto Plant

Electric-car startup Lucid Motors Inc. has an undisclosed commitment to build an…

Israel-Morocco deal is Trump’s latest distortion. And it could bring war, not peace.

President Donald Trump is touting his latest diplomatic coup — the partial…