The risks inherent in the technology, plus the speed of its take-up, demonstrate why it’s so vital that we keep track of it

  • Chris Moran is the Guardian’s head of editorial innovation

Last month one of our journalists received an interesting email. A researcher had come across mention of a Guardian article, written by the journalist on a specific subject from a few years before. But the piece was proving elusive on our website and in search. Had the headline perhaps been changed since it was launched? Had it been removed intentionally from the website because of a problem we’d identified? Or had we been forced to take it down by the subject of the piece through legal means?

The reporter couldn’t remember writing the specific piece, but the headline certainly sounded like something they would have written. It was a subject they were identified with and had a record of covering. Worried that there may have been some mistake at our end, they asked colleagues to go back through our systems to track it down. Despite the detailed records we keep of all our content, and especially around deletions or legal issues, they could find no trace of its existence.

Continue reading…

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You May Also Like

Greener play areas boost children’s immune systems, research finds

Autoimmune diseases are rising fast but first experimental study shows nature could…

FIFA 23’s Team of the Week 20 has all 80+ rated players for the first time

FIFA 23’s Team of the Week (TOTW) has only 80+ rated players…

The monarchy: so what are they for?

When Harry and Meghan took on ‘the firm’ in front of 50…

This bestselling waterproof Bluetooth speaker is now on sale for £17 on Amazon

Products featured in this Mail Best article are independently selected by our…