Readers respond to a judge’s decision to stop activists explaining their motivation for disruptive climate demonstrations

Judge Silas Reid prevented Insulate Britain defendants at the Inner London crown court from mentioning their motivation to commit non-violent “nuisance” (Insulate Britain activists found guilty over London roadblock, 13 February). How ironic and worrying that a court normally requiring “the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth” is happy to forgo that luxury in certain cases.
Rev Steve Smith
Truro, Cornwall

• As someone arrested for sitting in Whitehall with Extinction Rebellion in October 2019, motivated by George Monbiot’s speech, I am outraged that, in the trial of Insulate Britain activists, Judge Silas Reid did not allow the jury to hear about their motivation because it wasn’t “relevant”. The climate crisis is relevant to all of us everywhere.
Laura Conyngham
Crediton, Devon

Continue reading…

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You May Also Like

‘Like seeing a sculpture from a different angle’: Max Richter on rewriting The Four Seasons – for the second time

His 2012 reimagining of Vivaldi’s Four Seasons was huge hit. So why,…

Tories’ revised plans to scrap EU laws are still reckless, say lawyers

Kemi Badenoch’s ‘irresponsible’ proposals risk undermining rights relating to discrimination, the environment…

‘I felt violated. It was a dark period for all of us’: Sigur Rós on their nightmarish recent years

The band’s image as Iceland’s joyous musical elves was destroyed by allegations…