Online tool used by more than 50 cities helps planners weigh costs against climate and social benefits

In early 2018, Tomer Shalit looked at the overwhelming mass of data and the tens of thousands of pages of scientific studies and parliamentary reports that had gone into the making of Sweden’s bold new Climate Act, and thought: this is hopeless.

“There was this avalanche of material, but none of it was operational,” he said. “There were solid, ambitious targets, but no roadmaps for reaching them. There was a ton of evidence, but no concrete action plans. And nothing was connected.”

Continue reading…

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You May Also Like

David Lammy says he has ‘serious concerns’ about Israel’s actions in Gaza

Shadow foreign secretary says ‘far too many people have died’ but refuses…

A Guide to the New Workday Lunch—And How Much It’s Going to Cost

ON HIS FIRST DAY back in his New York City office in…

Proud Family

proud family louder and prouder

WhatsApp criticised for plan to allow messages to disappear after 24 hours

Children’s charities say change creates a ‘toxic cocktail of risk’ by making…