Instead of ramping up the threats, western nations should be offering Vladimir Putin a ladder to climb down

The current western narrative on the Ukraine crisis is that Russia is a machiavellian power with an expansionist agenda. That view is shaping our response: we are matching Vladimir Putin’s aggression, meeting strength with strength and threats with threats. But what if we tried to get inside the mind of the enemy, and ask what was motivating the aggression? By doing so, could we break this cycle – and offer Putin a way out, too?

When the USSR deployed ballistic missiles to Cuba in the 1960s, their proximity to the US nearly unleashed a third world war. Sitting in Moscow today, does Putin see being encircled by Nato as an equivalent threat? After all, one of his core demands is that Nato curbs its expansion close to the Russian border, and that Ukraine must not join. Russia claims that the US repeatedly told Soviet leaders it would incorporate Russia into a cooperative European security framework. In practice, Nato emerged as a US-dominated security frame with about 75,000 US troops still on European soil. Great powers always treat with suspicion and hostility the presence of rival great powers on their borders.

Gabrielle Rifkind is a specialist in conflict resolution and the director of Oxford Process

Continue reading…

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You May Also Like

Not Into a Bikini? Try Katharine Hepburn’s Layered Summer Style

I WOULDN’T say that the ’80s movie “On Golden Pond,” starring Henry…

Counter-terror chief reveals ‘real threat’ of school terror plots

Police stopped ‘eight late-stage terror plots’ in the past year Officers have…